joeshmo209

Which technique is better for restoring hairlines? I heard that FUT is better for restoring hairlines. I would choose this as my goal is to restore my hairline, but I am worried about the scar. I would like to buzz my hair from time to time without worrying about a huge scar on the back of my head? What have you heard? FUT better for restoring hairlines? Here are a couple pics of my hair loss. I want to fill in the temple areas and move my hairline down.

Anyone have any opinions/experiences with any of these doctors and would you recommend one? I'm not sure if I want to get FUE or FUT. India seems like a better choice for FUE and Thailand seems like a better choice for FUT. Here's a couple of pictures of my hair loss. I want to restore my hairline and fill in the temple areas.

How many FUT graphs would you consider excessive when considering the scar left behind. I'm assuming that the more graphs in FUT will lead to a more noticeable scar, so I was wondering when would and FUE procedure be a better option if you don't want to noticeable scar. I would like to have my hair very short, perhaps a buzz cut from time to time. ' I know that the scar is affected by the technique used when cutting out/sewing up the donor area, but that must be some sort of rough estimation on when FUE is a better option than FUT if that patient wants a almost undetectable scar. What do you think?