why does dr. woods not do a biopsy?

[Guest Pumpkinhole]

does anyone have an idea why dr. woods will perform fue w/o a biopsy? nhi requires the 'fox test' which apparently indicates how much transection there will be.

[Guest Pumpkinhole]

does anyone have an idea why dr. woods will perform fue w/o a biopsy? nhi requires the 'fox test' which apparently indicates how much transection there will be.

[Guest Pumpkinhole]

nhi does not charge anything for the fox text. at least that's what they told me. i understand that they used to, but they don't anymore.

 

i don't think there's any dispute that dr. woods has the most experience with fue. i was just curious about the biopsy because i want to ensure *I* am compatible with fue.

 

my hair situation is kind of weird. i am a norwood 2/3 with a bothersome frontal hairline that i believe adversely affects my carreer. i have no hairloss in the crown, or no miniaturization anywhere but my temples. having strip done would be utterly stupid for me given the risks involved and the limited hairloss i have at this point. i have taken finasteride for a while now, and although i feel a difference, i don't see any. if i get a hair transplant now at my stage, i'm in it for life.

 

the only drawback i see about dr. woods is price. good grief!

[Guest]

Baldbozo

 

Have you posted any photos of your Woods surgery?

 

Paul

 

My surgery with Dr. Sharon Keene:

 

http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/bc/paul148148/lst?&.dir=/Transplant+Photos&.src=ph&.view=t