Dr. Bernard Nusbaum

Six month results:

3141- follicular units:

755- 1's

1504- 2's

882- 3's and 4's.

May 3, 2010- 2 Procedures

1st procedure Front March 19,2008

2599 f.u.

603- 1's

1289- 2's

707-3's and 4's.

2nd procedure Crown April 3,2009

2184 f.u.

505-1's

1048-2's

631-3's and 4's.

9 month results.

2950 follicular units:

219- 1's

1292- 2's

1439- 3's and 4's.

Frontal hairline Restoration:

1863 Follicular units

443-1's

884-2's

536-3's and 4's.

One year results.

1682 follicular units:

307- 1's

682- 2's

693- 3's and 4's.

One year results.

2050 follicular units:

508- 1's

1065- 2's

477- 3's and 4's

Female pattern hair loss 7 month results:

1565 follicular units:

372- 1's

771- 2's

422- 3's and 4's

One year follow up.

3063 Follicular units

:

683- 1's

1729- 2's

651- 3's and 4's.

six month results, 2717 follicular units:

724- 1's

1354- 2's

639- 3's and 4's.

8 months results: 3088 follicular units

620- 1's

1607- 2's

861- 3's and 4's.

Female Hairline Restoration 1-1/2 year post operative.

1428 follicular units:

367- 1's

576- 2"s

485- 3's and 4's.

Traction Alopecia:9 months results 1696 follicular units

627-1's

682-2's

387-3's and 4's.

44 year old man- 8 month results.

3615 follicular units to crown and both temporal recessions.

650-1's

2013-2's

952-3's and 4's.

I would like to thank those who have posted their views on this topic. To clarify a few points, I would like to state that the ABHRS is NOT dedicated to providing an exchange forum for medical information, or to being a watchdog organization. Those functions are well served by the ISHRS (educational) and the Internet forums. The sole purpose of the ABHRS is to provide a credible examination process to test whether physicians possess a certain body of knowledge in the field of hair restoration. So far, in its 10 years of providing its examination, the ABHRS has not been questioned with regard to the scope and fairness of its exam, or the integrity of the examination process itself. Certainly, there are differing opinions regarding whether this type of examination is necessary in the field of hair restoration and whether the term "board" should be utilized. I would like to assure you that I bring an open mind to any discussion.

On the other hand, it is my opinion that physicians who possess certain knowledge will be better prepared to successfully handle situations which might arise in the actual practice of hair restoration, and that, encouraging physicians to acquire this knowledge, in turn, will help patients. That is not to say that EXPERTISE in performing certain surgical techniques can be taught by books or tested with examinations. In this regard, I feel that regular posting of patient results and commentary to the public is crucial in educating patients with regards to physician expertise. I only ask the readers to have an open mind as well, and consider the DIFFERENT contributions that, medical education ,encouraging and testing physicians' knowledge as well as open Internet forums provide towards the common goal of improving patient results.

Thank you,

Dr. Nusbaum

Without question,I utilize single hair follicular units at the front edge of the hairline. I also separate follicular units to obtain the necessary number of single hairs when sufficient numbers are not available.

I am keeping an open mind on the issue of larger megasessions.

Dr.Nusbaum