When I started dealing with the topic, I intuitively thought about scars. After reading a million pages of doctors talking about scarless surgery, I somehow forgot about my initial fears.
In fact, scarring would be a problem and it would rule out the possibility of shaving me bald for the rest of my life. I have thin hair and if the transplant is not perfect (and I can't be sure it will be), I may have to make friends with the trimmer again.
Are we talking about scarring everywhere or just in the donor area?
After the message from @Gatsby, who also brought up the topic of scars, I thought about the scars are on both the donor and recipient areas, because both are punctured.
@A_4_Archan however mentioned that it was about scarring in the donor area. Maybe it's because the punctures there are larger in diameter and that's why you can see scars in donor and not in the recipient area?
Maybe you see scars in the donor area because there was hair there, now it is gone, but there is a trace on the skin. And are the traces lost in the recipient area because new hair is growing there and it is the center of attention?
I realize that the topic is of little importance for people who have luscious hair after transplantation. I would like to have them too, but as I mentioned, you have to consider all the consequences.
And anyway, do you think it is possible to do a transplant without scars?