milogarrett

Still, would you be alarmed to this? I get the feeling that surgeon specifically evades text discussion, because he fears that I will screen our dialogue and his potential BS will be called when shown online.

That's what I'm talking about! It felt so strange and unusual it immediately tick me off. I didn't made it up. For some reason he was asking me to not to post my journey on forum. And though English is not my native language, there was no misunderstanding of his words (I'm sure that he will say exactly this if it will get to public discussion). Doctor could blame it on a many factors, like my aggressive hair loss, or that I slightly tipped my head in one point right after the surgery. Or that I skipped postop visits. To me it is the same song called "It's you, not me". The clinic didn't write me first, by the way: I did write them myself in month 1, 5, 6, 10. I will search photos in history. Now my donor is quite long, so there is no butchered look. Just afraid that there's little left for the future.

good evening! Let's say that I had a surgery in the end of 2022. After that I had a few calls that ticked me off. 1st call - Next day after the procedure doctor asked me not to publish any report yet. 2nd call was when I noticed how large the gaps in donor zone was. Eventually it healed, but it took 4 months. I'm afraid that there was overharvesting in some areas. + my donor hair was extracted not only from DHT resistant zone, but close to the neck too. 3rd call was in month 6, when I started to get the feeling that my result will be poor. Doctor asked me to give it time, but it is been ~10 months, and results are not satisfying. When I adress that problem, doctor specifically evades any explanation in text and talks through the calls or voicemail. He says that results may come late, but from what I've seen, medium is 7-8 months. 4th call was when doctor repeated his ask to not to discuss my case with anyone except himself. Is my surgeon acting shady b/c he knows that he did subpar work? Would love to hear unbiased thoughts: if you were in my shoes, would you consider it conspicious?