BigMike36

On 12/18/2023 at 12:46 PM, Melvin- Admin said:

As a “retired lawyer” I’m a bit shocked you misspelled “courtesy and alluding”. I will revert the “unprofessional” statement right back at you. 

Anyone reading can see the obvious connection between you and this clinic. No one joins these discussions, gives a one-star rating to be “objective” btw you said subjective, instead of objective. Posting photos doesn’t change these charges. The only reason you would try and say this would be to discredit their experiences. 

Would posting photos change someone’s medical license status? No. That’s all anyone reading needs to know. 

You got me. I’m an old man and I can’t see darn thing. I’m a big guy as well my fingers are big plus auto correct and I can’t see I refuse to get readers. Aging is not graceful. Merry Christmas 

On 12/18/2023 at 8:17 AM, BeHappy said:

 

On several posts here you say you think this is funny. I don't know what can possibly be funny about this. You've just come onto this forum less than 2 months ago yet you seem to think you know more than those of us who has been here for years and have known about these people and what they have been doing for several years.

You say it's not possible for a Dr to be charged with performing surgery without a license, but you are wrong. One Dr involved in the clinic I went to (no relation to the McTyres or any of their clinics) who performed 2 hair transplants on me was banned from performing any type of surgery in NY except for hair transplants. If he was found doing any surgery other than hair transplants he could have been charged with performing surgery or surgical procedures without a license to do so. Officially it would probably be labeled as professional misconduct, but basically it would be for him performing surgery without a license that allows him to do so.

I will provide a link in case you think I'm making this up.

https://apps.health.ny.gov/pubdoh/professionals/doctors/conduct/factions/FileDownloadAction.action?finalActionId=3663&fileName=lc148463.pdf&fileSeqNum=1

 

 

I’m sorry to hear what happened to you. Thank you for sharing. The court document you sent was very helpful. It can happen you are correct and limitations on a doctors license or public record any violations can be accessed by anyone. In this particular case this doctor has no violations no nothing therefore no restrictions on license. However in your case which I’m very sorry for, that doctor had restrictions due to being incompetent and was not allowed to practice medicine in a clinical setting (good thing). I’m laughing at the cities awful system. How inaccurate it is and how recently they let go a woman that admitted to murdering a person due to technicality in the system. What I can see here is what these two were supposed to be charged for isn’t represented in the actually system. But again we are seeing this occurrence often. Not laughing at anything else but this major glitch. But a doctor without any limitations can’t be charged with this crime in our state and city. I have reached out to the attorney and have not received an answer. I also have made prosecutors office aware of the error. I try to help media and other platforms as often times these mishaps end up negatively effecting anyone who posted information that may not be accurate. I’m sorry that I came off as laughing at the situation as at this point I’m truly dumb founded with coding system. 

I was trying to help your organization not post nonvalid information but you seem to want to go ahead and have incorrect information.  Hence why I flagged it a 1 star to get ones attention. It was professional curtesy. A doctor cant be charged with that crime. I was alluding to that to help.  Melvin I have no idea what your issue is or what you are illuding to. My original point was about the court error.  The charges were not entered correct by the city. That is the story I was working on as the cities system has been creating major issues.  A few months ago for a similar error occurred and they let a murder walk.

Then I subjectively made a comment from an observation. Its simple not one person that had surgery from that company has posted an image in 6 years correct? The only person that has you attack, like me. That says enough in itself.  I can't have a subjective opinion based off of an observation? You just told me who cares.  Does it matter who cares, did I ask for your opinion? I asked you to explain if they have been removed how I see that occurrence on my own.  As incase you forgot you indicated I was apparently  supposed to know, did you not? Everything I have commented on was subjective in manner. But thank you for showing me what your blog is. Your attitude is not professional.  Good luck to you. 

is it possible for you to please help me understand how I would be able to tell if an image was posted and then removed?  I don't know anyone here. I'm trying to do what I explained and I'm being attacked.  I've been ambivalent and subjective. 

It seems like all of you know each other so I can provide background.  I'm a retired attorney and I have a side business.   I was looking into a transplant about a year ago.  After searching to get more information on a potential national story. I still have my licensee to practice law which grants access to court systems and records.  I do say that with my experience I did find it odd to not see anyone's images. But the one individual mentioned. If anyone else has any questions please feel free to ask.  My intensions are personal intermixed with potential side job.  I also am open to any information if one wants to make available I would appreciate anything. If not I do enjoy the content, making me consider readdressing my hair loss that I try to ignore. 

On 12/13/2023 at 6:11 PM, Melvin- Admin said:

I look forward to your update. 

4 hours ago, Sunset Dune said:

Hmmm something really fishy is going on here… @Michael D show us your results now?

has one patient from the Virginia Surgical Center showed one photo, besides Michael D? 

Yes what you said is common sense but that is not what one is being charged with. We are all looking forward to watching this go to trial. As it’s very interesting but a lot of pieces are missing and not adding up why answers will be provided in court. But the media aspect is the same thing I saw for decades and always resulted in the same outcome every time. That’s what changed it for me. That was my point but I respect your prospective as I said and have said it’s your world. 

3 hours ago, Melvin- Admin said:

Patients have a right to anonymity. You suggesting that this somehow discredits the patient is ridiculous. It’s also your first post defending this clinic 🤔 . A doctor is not able to lend his license to someone without a license and allow them to perform surgeries. 
 

For example, a cardiologist can’t open up a clinic under his name, then allow me to perform double bypass surgeries without having a medical license. That’s pretty much common sense. 

No I don’t even know the clinic or the people. It’s just the talk of attorney world in my city the city where this is occurring. His charges are aiding and abetting and conspiracy to commit invasive procedure. The actually system doesn’t even have that coded properly. Again this is your world. But in my former world different prospective law is the law and more validity when one doesn’t go on TV until after the criminal proceedings have commenced. If that makes sense. 

3 hours ago, BaldDude said:

doctors have to be licensed by the state they're performing surgery in. 

He is licensed by the state why it’s funny 

I agree with you but that one news story changed things. Why won’t he show his face? If it’s that bad then one should be compensated, but typically on these stories they go on camera to show how bad it is. My days of litigation are long gone this is text book behavior to get one to stroke a check. Most malpractice settlements are very private. But man seriously think it’s hilarious they charged a doctor for not having license that doesn’t even make sense but I needed a laugh. This is your world Melvin I’ll defer to you. 

It just so weird it’s kind of funny. Maybe I’m missing something.. 

9 minutes ago, Melvin- Admin said:

Are you affiliated with them?

Did you see this one? Link below.. something is just not adding up. I also find it funny that a doctor got charged with not having license to do a hair transplant. It’s just so weird but this story says a lot

https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/virginia-beach/couple-indicted-for-allegedly-performing-hair-transplants-in-vb-without-license/

Agree this whole thing is so stupid it’s funny. Best part is am I correct to say. Other people got arrested in summer but they still haven’t had prelim hearing? 

On 11/29/2023 at 10:08 PM, Michael D said:

My understanding is they are still able to operate too. I wonder why?

Im sorry but the whole thing is so funny. How can a doctor be charged with not having a license? and the guy keeps talking about money. Entire thing is super odd. Hair restoration isn’t a sub specialty of medicine there are 24 of them but hair restoration isn’t one. Which makes this all so damn funny.