TV_on_LazerDisk

Let's just wait for the new studies/trials, to get a better idea. No use guessing especially when we have talented doctors doing studies.

Also other yap inhibitors are in the works, so someone who gets their a hair transplant with verteporfin might get a surgery later with another even more effective yap inhibitor five years down the line. Personally I don't want to wait five years as a younger guy with aggressive hair loss.

One of the biggest changes I imagine is also follow up surgeries and mega sessions will be easier and more flexible if you know some amount of the donor will grow back. You can harvest more and if anything that takes more skill for advanced cases to look natural. If anything top surgeons will be even more valuable. The surgeons on board to test verteporfin now are top guys and I think they understand the potential. With all cosmetic surgery good surgery is often more subtle and looks natural that's the key.

I get that I mean when it's more accepted. Personally I'll only go to a doctor who does vert but I want to wait around a year to the technique is more finished. So hopefully around then we'll see.

I mean at the point where it's something patients request as part of their hair transplant.

After we have some proven success it would make more sense. I'm waiting to get a hair transplant for the results of vert, and I think if it's successfully advanced cases and guys with weak donars will care allot

I think asking him after the the trials are done would be better

Zarevs punch method might work for this

I was asking because it would mean if it worked 1 that combined with verteporfin could be used for maintenance 2 if verteporfin grew new hair follicles on balding spots due to being dht sensitive they might have shortened lives so this would allow those to be maintained I could imagine you do a ht, get deep microwounding or extraction of dormant hair follicles for increased density and derma papilla for maintenance Verteporfin plus dermal papilla would be the cure

Off topic but what do you think of the injecting of Dermal Papilla cells as preventure for future hair loss

I think if we were more supportive it would make a difference too. Like you said he did a biopsy and ordered the device. Let's focus on the positives and get back to trying to raise awareness, bring doctors on board and positively engage in support of this. I know it's something we can do.

I've mentioned before the use of hgh to expedite healing this is possible with a prescription in most countries

I think it's best we wait and move on, not make negative speculations. As there is no logical reason for dishonesty. We let stress get the best of us.

Yeah that would be perfect I was on a date with a girl and I literally checked this forum during my date haha.

I wouldn't want to use the current hairloss medication for various reasons. If the results from vert come through I'd get a hair transplant but really only if regenerative donor sites are an option. I have a shaved head and it hasn't hurt me dating wise, but I miss my full head of hair (even if you looked good with a shaved head, in a suit or a tux you feel silly, I can't explain it). I'm too lazy to use a hair system, any of those sorts of things and a hair transplant without vert and not taking hairloss medication seems silly. Vert seems to have good regenerative abilities, from the results around the web.

I think we are being a bit overly skeptical. There is no evidence the results were photoshopped. He has taken his time and effort to help us and making this sorts of accusations is being very unappreciative.

I mean that would mean perpetual recovery time, that many HTs. You'd never get to enjoy your new hair haha

https://srginstruments.com/introduction/ Someone on the vert group mentioned this @DrTBarghouthi

We assumed Dr Bloxhams study being late was due to negative reasons and it wasn't. Dr. Bargouthi runs a clinic on top of doing this study and has been polite to us. We owe him the same.

I feel like I'm waiting for Santa Claus

Yep, also allot of facial implant scars can be in places with facial hair.

Yeah that's my question too. Bloxhams study though is probably incredibly helpful for scar reduction/prevention in other procedures.

It was impressive from a scar reduction stand point

It also means if a treatment permanently cures dht sensitivety in existing hairs, baldness is essentially cured. Hair won't need to be cloned. So all the studies on Dermal Papilla cells will be enough to make hairloss gone. The bar for what we need has been lowered. Hair transplant plus that means we all can have thick permenant heads of hair. The two combined means we could have youthful hairlines restored. Thick dense heads or hair. Honestly the future I see is this, when Dr Zarev trains more people on his method. A hair transplant looks more like one mega fue session with verteporfin, dermal Papilla injection and you have your hair back. It's more like getting prk or lasik a long lasting treatment that restores prior ability. THING BIG

Yep for cosmetic surgery and reconstructive surgery too which are adjacent industries.