Mirko nooh

Is there any "documentation" for the numbers/rate of necrosis in different clinics? Don't you think (on a wider scope) that this information should be collected for all patients (and potential patients) to be used? This way we could choose more wisely. It seems like at the moment, if one clinic produces too many necrosis - there's no 'mechanism' to stop this from happening.

what do you think should the ethical patient do? should he post about his necrosis?

If that's the case, I really do think that when some users here reply (about cases of necrosis) that "don't worry, that's the difference between hairmills and clinic X/Y/Z. Clinic X/Y/Z will take care of it and fix it for free if needed", fails to address that having a necrosis is by itself a big issue. This is just damage control of something that shouldn't have happen on the first place, and if it happens systematically is shows no critical thinking is being done by the clinic. Not only I see, by reading posts here, that this is the approach of a very esteemed spanish surgeon (who some started calling "hairmill"), but as for myself I also had a surgery and necrosis with one of the recommended surgeons here on this website. After searching for some "reviews posted by patients" (and not "results posted by clinics"), it seems there're too many cases of "small necrotic areas" by this surgeon.

Hello everyone. What is your stance about the above statement? what is considered a 'legitimate' necrosis complications by a surgeon? is is ~20%? 5%? and if there is such - does it almost certainly reflect an error by the surgeon?