Hi,
I had a hair transpant in a highly reputed european clinic 7,5 months ago.
My starting point is "I was bald" (like NW VI).
The clinic proposed to take a 1st procedure (around 4050 graft) for the frontal part to begin and then evaluate a second transplant for the crown in the future.
They told me that the surgery went as expected, the head after scabs fell (around 11 days after the surgery) looked very good.
After that, things went on normally until the 2nd month and a week when I had a bad folliculitis that lasted 6-7 weeks (where I have been instructed to use an antibiotic cream morning and evening).
Folliculitis resolved around 3,5 months from surgery. they told me to start using minoxidil.
Around the 4th month some regrowth started but very slow.
At the 6th month the situation was better but the regrowth was still really poor in density compared to right after surgery when scabs fell (in most of the recipient area it looks like if less of 20% of grafts have survived).
It was the 1st check point that was discussed with the clinic to evaluate the transplant and compared to other transplants and to what people say about timeline, my transplant seemed a very bad failure (even if I were a slow grower).
At the clinic they told me to wait to evaluate the result at least till 1 year, that my folliculitis might have slowed the regrowth, that new hair can come out till 1 year, and after that it could take more time to see the hair thickening.
1 month and a half later I don't really see any improvement compared to 6th month (taking hi-res pics of zones in detail and comparing hairs one to one, they are the same, it doesn't look like new hairs are spurring out at all).
Can I really expect a real improvement still (something that could take me close to the "11 days post surgery" result) or should i start bracing for a bad failure?