SMPFUE

Cya bitch

All of them, how many did you receive? I consider you a troll, we can go back and forth all day. But I don’t feed trolls, I screw with them.

Oh I don’t know? Good info. I’m glad you know so much about my hair transplant, great feedback. I’m pretty happy the only red flag is that you don’t know if I know the graft count.

Because I was giving this website a genuine second chance but the site blew it. That other guy, no matter how much you think it was Maag, it actually wasn’t. I verified myself that it wasn’t Maag. I was just now told that my hair transplant has red flags all over it by someone who can’t name one, other than that I’m not responding nicely… after he said I had red flags but refused to name them. Use some logical thinking.

Here I’ll down your feeeback. you think I shouldn’t need to use concealer at 6 months…. And that is ridiculous. The vast majority of hair transplants don’t look good at 6 months, they typically start filling in around the 6 to 9 month mark, I’m at the beginning of my growth stage, how is this a red flag?

The red flag you mentioned was that I wasn’t responding respectfully to you? That’s not a red flag bro, that’s just you coming at me with low quality posts so I came back at you with the same quality. A red flag should be about the work done, not how someone responds to you or if they pay this website for protection.

I never said anyone deleted my old review, I know I deleted it, I said my link was deleted to my review on the other site where I’m actually including pictures. I didn’t want to waste my time uploading pictures here knowing that I’d likely just delete them if this site didn’t clean up. This site is still ran poorly, so I’m glad I didn’t waste all that time.

I tried giving this site a second chance, hoping that the trolls with chest hair poorly transplanted on their heads were gone and this place cleaned up, but no… this site is just a cesspool and attacks a certain type of person.

You deleted the link to the other website in this post where I had pictures. If you didn’t, the other mod did. I had a link to hair loss experiences site and it was edited out by a mod.

May as well just say I am since I have good results from there and they refuse to pay this site the blackmail money required to get blindly backed by the mods. Every patient from HHR is just Maag.

All of them. How many did you receive?

Oh look in less than 20 minutes my crown thickened up, definitely growth and not more cherry picking angles, lighting, and hair style cover up like EVERYONE ELSE on this site.

That other guy was a patient, you just refused to accept that fact as truth. This site lives off doctors paying for endorsements, not ethical.

As you can see from my super high quality picture, I barely have anything next that needs to fill in. Crown takes the longest to thicken, EVERYONE knows that, so I’m good.

About 1000 if I use super harsh lighting or 9000 if I use the type of lighting typically seen on this website.

The mods deleted it because they don’t want people to know there are legitimate hair sites that don’t require payments for endorsement. Here are some pictures of today with the type of angle quality and lighting that you are more adjusted to seeing from this community. Looks like I had a bunch of growth in just 24 hours. Neither picture has concealer, this is literally just the angle and quality of pictures you see on this site when faking results.

Other than going to a place that doesn’t want to pay this website for endorsement, what are the red flags? This is honestly why I stopped posting here, honestly the feedback from this site is so damn low quality. Last time I posted, which was literally my 1 month mark where I was shedding, people said red flags too, but couldn’t name anything other than that I went to a clinic that isn’t partnered with this site to be a part of the obvious bias circle jerk. I’m at 6 months and growth just took off, how is that a red flag? The only red flag is that I use harsh lighting for my pictures instead of cherry picking angles and lighting to fake results like the vast majority… I get good feedback from literally any place I post except here and Reddit, and both are known as bias cesspools. Come on, do better or this community dies off.

The link I included with over 100 pictures was deleted because this website requires doctors to pay for endorsements, here’s the pictures you get. I’m done here, you are all a joke, go transplant more ball and chest hair to your heads and keep pretending it doesn’t look like crap. I’ll enjoy my new hair elsewhere

You just did mental gymnastics there, yet another red flag. I’m not saying I want an echo chamber, I pointed out the obvious one. The way I want feedback is the way I give feedback, high quality with actual content. Saying “pfft that HT is bad because I looked at it and said it’s bad based on my 15 years of experience “ is trash feedback and basically sums up what you said. If you have actual feedback like “it looks like they took 4k grafts but only used 2k” that would at least be substantial feedback…. But the feedback that you give, which you think is knowledge based feedback, is literal garbage. You give garbage feedback and then stand on a soap box while giving it. Truth is, there is no way even the most knowledgeable person on this forum could give valid feedback based on the pictures I provided and all of the circumstances combined. I wasn’t planning on posting those pictures, but honestly felt pressured to because it felt like deja vu from Reddit where I was going to be accused of being Dr. Maag. Then I posted the pictures, dealt with trolling, then saw that instead of me being accused of being Dr. Maag, the other guy was. So it obvious to me that this place is very similar to r/hair transplants and I’m not interested in that type of forum, which is why I removed my content.

Even if the ego isn’t the reason behind why you give advice, the truth is you give bad feedback and you are quick to do it, which is enough of a red flag for me. You call my hair transplant sub par, yet you really can’t say why other than a subjective opinion that they extracted more than they implanted. And even that little bit of feedback that you gave is low quality and the type of feedback that I expect from someone who doesn’t really know how hair transplants work. 15 years of looking at pictures and getting a hair transplant yourself doesn’t make you an expert, and that mindset is what ruins a lot of these types of communities. For you to even make the statement you made in good faith, you would have needed much higher quality pictures than what I provided, and even then it would be hard because the SMP really hides a bunch of it. You made it clear that you were just looking to bash everything I had done, you even kept throwing in the “don’t mean to offend” again and again. Truth is, you aren’t as knowledgeable as you think you are. When you are making a post and you find yourself having to type “I don’t mean to offend” just go ahead and hold down the backspace until everything you typed before that is erased. You don’t have the knowledge to make the type of posts that you make. If I wasn’t knowledgeable in this stuff you reallly would have caused me to worry, but luckily this is not the first hair forum I’ve joined, I’ve been around a bunch since around 2007 when I first noticed my own hair issues. You give out feedback as if it is based on knowledge when it it based on opinion and then people literally echo chamber it, whether you are willing to admit it or not ( they basically did by saying “I’m going to echo what he said”. You didn’t give any actual feedback and then someone echoed the same feedback with again, not giving any actual feedback. I suggest you learn about SMP and hair transplants and get a better understanding of how they impact each other. HTs will make an SMP look awful in the early stages because the skin literally just went through a traumatic experience is going to scab and peel. SMP will make HTs harder to judge in early stages because the pigmentation hides the redness and makes grafts harder to notice because they blend in, especially with a lower quality camera. These are things I’ve known for years and now you can add it to your knowledge of 15 years of looking at pictures.

The thing is, there are three types of people who typically hang out around these types of forums. There are the people who truly enjoy helping other people, those who are looking for peer support, and those who have ego issues so they look for a fix. The people who offer the most help are typically the group that truly want to help and the ego issue person because they are looking to buff up their ego. When someone looks like they are the ego person, which is how you come across, I really want nothing to do with it. The reason I say you come off that way is because you post in a way where you are more focused on letting me know how knowledgeable you are instead of giving actually valuable feedback. You said it looked like they took a bunch of grafts and didn’t insert them, I asked how many grafts do you think they extracted, and you let me know how you have 15 years of experience looking at pictures. You don’t give feedback on people’s pictures, you advertise your knowledge. This is the field I am an actual expert in, psychology. When I see patterns I get a feel for people pretty fast, and you have patterns. You actually remind me of wallaby from Reddit. Not saying you are him, but you both have the same ego thing going on. He has his because he is a mod in a popular subreddit. I believe yours is because you’ve been struggling with hair loss for a long time, which is an ego blow to most people, but you found a place that accepts you (here) and the longer you’ve been here the more “acceptance” you get and you tie your acceptance to your feedback, so you feel the need to comment regardless of if your content is a high quality feedback or a sht post. Truth is, with my SMP Any knowledgeable person would understand that they cannot give valuable feedback on the early stages of a hair transplant through pictures because the SMP, even a sub par one, hides a lot of the indicators of a good or bad hair transplant. It is impossible to see how many grafts were placed based on the pictures I took. I didn’t even use the front high MP camera because those were just pictures I was taking for myself. When I looked at some when I was taking them I thought my crown was missed and I asked my girlfriend to check. She even said she could clearly see grafts there, but couldn’t get a good picture either. I had to look with a magnifying mirror and then I was able to see my coverage. So yea, long story short, your feedback is bad, it isn’t based on technical knowledge, and I’m assuming you are here to fix your ego rather than help people, and I’m not interested in that.

This is the part they don’t understand. We had the experience with Dr. Maag, They didn’t. Yet they are judging based on if they are the authority of what is a good or bad transplant based off a few pictures and their biases rather than technical knowledge that an actual expert in the field would have.

This is what ruins a lot of these types of forums… people who actually say stuff like “I have 15+ years of experience” but the experience is just looking at pictures and judging. In that case I have about 15 years of experience myself and in my 15 years of looking over 100s of transplants, I can confidently say anyone that calls a transplant sub par by looking at the 7 week results is being biased. I’ve never seen results at 7 weeks and was able to confidently say if it would turn out good or not. The armchair hair transplant surgeons online gets so old so fast.

But your opinion of sub par work is absolutely unwarranted. You really didn’t give any meaningful feedback. You didn’t state why you thought it was sub par, just claimed that they took more grafts than they needed, without any realistic way of knowing this. It is easy to point out what looks like flaws in a transplant that is only 7 weeks old. If I had my work done by the best surgeon in the world and then lied and said it was Dr. Maag’s work you would crap all over it just because it is tied to Dr. Maag. I see other people post 3 months results and people are optimistic and tell them it looks great and to enjoy growing it out when it looks like absolute trash. So this makes it very obvious that my feedback isn’t about how it looks and is all about where I got it done.

To be fair, I’m at my 7 week mark and I am actually very knowledgeable about hair loss and transplants and nobody has impressive looking work at the 7 week mark. I also have an SMP which makes it incredibly hard to really tell what was done. Even using a normal mirror I had a hard time seeing some of the grafts because it blended in with the SMP, but when I use a magnifying mirror I can clearly see the grafts. So I already know that I’m wasting my time posting progress pictures until it’s all done because haters will find a reason to hate. He is likely defensive of Dr. Maag because it gets tiring when we ( his patients ) try to make a post about hair transplants and some idiot online responds with “BuT hE tRiEd To kilL sOmEonE wiTh HiS car” every time.