I did some research over the months, and there’s a few attractive take-away’s for me.
- DHI is, in fact, FUE… only the implantation method is diff’t
- healing time is faster with DHI than with FUE
- I’ve read that there is less scarring than with FUE (I’ve only read this recently; I’d do more research on this!)
- I prefer the harvesting method of DHI over FUE. With FUE, after the removal of the grafts, they are placed in a solution (to keep em from drying out and dying), and then implanted into the incisions the docs made earlier. With DHI, a DHI-implanter tool is used to remove the graft, once the grafts are extracted (FUE), they are loaded into the DHI implanter pen, and implanted into the scalp. This supposedly minimizes the time the grafts are out of the body.
- its a myth that grafts die immediately once its outside the body. Apparently, grafts can theoretically last for hours outside the body. Whether or not that’s true, that’s at least one area of DHI I wouldn’t have to worry about.
The debate rages on as to which method is “better’, which yields a better result; and I’ve even noticed some people say there’s no real difference in results. But from my own research, I’ve seen more consistent results with DHI. To each their own, I guess.
The bottom line is, it doesn’t really matter which technique is “better”; it just really depends on how skilled the dr. is.
(Edit: corrected to include more accurate information.)