RandoBrando517

4 hours ago, mtb said:

I think the reason he’s touted is because he’s the only high, Norwood FUE-only doc getting full coverage and the illusion of full density. I agree the physicians you named have great results. But of all their photos I haven’t seen slick bald Norwood sixes with full coverage from fue-only and perfect looking donor areas. Just Zarev. If you’re a NW4 and below any of the guys you named would be awesome. My procedure is set for early next year.  I trust him. And I know this means nothing to anyone here since it’s my personal experience but in the consultation he shows many many examples more of NW6 patients with perfect post op donor areas. I wish he had a better online presence with that stuff. So to answer the OP I say Zarev. 

He got like 8-9 cases that he always shows. Def not a portfolio that would make him the best

Its bout dam time they get a HELL YEA from me

On 10/26/2022 at 3:31 PM, x.moonprincess.xo said:

I think I paid about $8.25 per graft, going FUE for 1700 grafts. 

Dang too rich for my blood

My bad I aint tryna be a d!ck ima be honest with u prolly not shock loss 

Asli Taracan strikes again

How much does Nadimi charge now?

Did u mention this 2 the clinic during surgery? If u saw an area u wanted covered and didn’t say nothing how can u blame anyone other than urself if that area wasn’t in ur original plan? 

45 minutes ago, Tommy1991 said:

Defo not tripping. Merely basing the look on density is not what I’m seeking… 

have a read of the post again for all details. 
 

regarding the outcome I will be patiently waiting for the results, these comments of mine are the facts at the moment and most to my annoyance is the gaps that were left. From supposedly a top clinic and doctor. It should not happen, period.

Certainly can agree with Happyman2021. 
 

Bro u have no idea what its gonna look like u comparing how it looks at 3 months if you look at the gaps you have hair there and u can’t even see anything grown out

Honestly don’t know y zarev is so hyped up he’s got like 10 results he recycles and only one review here I think Cuoto De Freitas Pinto Bisanga are better and have way more results 

Bro u barely had a transplant 3 months ago I think you’re trippin over nothin looks better than most HTs at 3 months 

Just now, Alphaone said:

This review lacks a lot of vital information. Please see my reply I posted there

 he pretty much got his donor destroyed what else is there 2 say

meh I think it looks good u we’re bald as hell b4 no offense 

The work looks really good he gets my vote but y fuegenix lol

9 hours ago, HAIR_WE_GO said:

What's wrong with posting 5 threads? If it's against the rules then I can delete no issue. Just wanted to add it to different areas I thought people would find it useful. 🤷‍♂️

LMFAO 

Why did you call me 5 times in a row

Telemarketer: They were for different products.

🤣🤣🤣😭😭

Lmao “I can give u a discount” bro ur a shill GTFO

Just now, mustang said:

Experience does not determine quality. I have read some horror stories on Bisanga but that was a long time ago.

There are surgeons with thousands of cases and 3 decades of experience that still perform poorly, I know one or two.

Ferreira is on the same level as Couto and Freitas, for me Freitas is by a mile the best in the world, nobody comes close other than Couto who trained him.

I had surgery with Ferreira and Couto and well guess who did a better job.

Results is what determines quality and I can pull up 3x the number of results for Bisanga. Ferreira has a few and one botched one on here the number of cases and of body wrk aint comparable 2 me

Ferreira over Bisanga lol ur mad man he doesn’t even have 1/4 of the experience hes good but no where near Bisanga I would put Pinto in the mix and without a doubt the goat Konior

Bro u gotta grow it out man no HTs look good with short hair dats y u never see anyone here with short hair. 

DAMN we gotta new doc on da scene

Bro dem grafts look bigger than tic tacs lolol he messed homeboy up bad damn

1 minute ago, sukh123 said:

I never said I didn’t like eugenix , I’ve even said they’re a good clinic in particular dr sethi . But people on this forum push them as if they’re the holy grail of transplants when they’re not . When people say they’re one of the best at donor management and then you see 7 cases of shock loss and over harvesting then your argument becomes obsolete. There was another case just this week where a simple restoration was done poorly . My point is that they’re a good clinic but not one of the best as people push on this forum . There are far better options like konoir , couto , bisanga , pinto and so on

What do they got to do with this thread tho? U bring em up constantly to bash em when it aint even relevant. The people who praise em are usually they patients u don’t like it, like coo but bringing it up constantly is sus 2 me 

Jeezus christ man who ur surgeon? 

50 minutes ago, sukh123 said:

You can spin it around and say the same thing about good results lol, the thing is people tend to post bad results on  a forum because they need to vent like yourself . Seen it today with a couto case , where it was very poor and the guy created a thread to say it . I have not seen 8 on this forum I think I’ve seen a few subpar, but also seen some excellent results on this forum so let’s keep this balanced . I’ve seen subpar results from eugenix and poor donor management, but people on this forum still push them as this holy grail when they’re not. While they are good, there are better options out there and not the best as some will continue to push on this forum

Bro we get it u don’t like Eugenix this is ur second post today talking about them they have a lot of good cases u don’t like em thats cool but y constantly bring it up? Seems weird to me 

On 7/25/2022 at 3:38 PM, michael hofmann said:

Yes, this is the graft placement after the second surgery, my donor area on the back after the second surgery and current photos. This is a picture of my donor area at the left side 6 weeks after my first operation.

Bro u wanna us to believe this is the best photo u got lmao this potato taken a mile away lolololol bro flip phones from the 2000s had more megapixels u cant post one single before and after photo. U wanna be taken seriously post the photos and don’t post these tiny potato pics