Aardvark

Hey, thanks for the reply. Do you mind explaining why the number of grafts is insufficient? My goals are conservative in terms of hairline. I don't need a mane, I am happy with hairline retention. What sort of procedure should I aim for, in your perspective? /Aardvark

Hi all, I recently went to a local clinic for a consultation. I don't think the place is listed here, but it's in Sweden and it's called New Hair Clinic. So anyway, the surgeon suggested I do 800 FUE grafts to fill in the hairline around my temples, at a thickness of around 35-40 grafts per cm2. The hairline would be shaped in a sort of zig zag pattern, to imitate my natural hairline. I attach pictures for clarity. I would just like to have your take on the recommendations. Given the state of my hairline (which I guess is a Norwood 2?), would this be sufficient? I am 31 years old, so I expect I will need to have a few more of these as times passes. Best, Aardvark

Hi all, I recently went to a hair restoration clinic for a consultation. The place is in Sweden (where I live), and from what I can tell it's not listed on this site. But they've been active for 25 years, so I figured I would give it a go: https://www.newhairclinic.se/ Anyway, the surgeon suggested I undergo a conservative FUE procedure of around 800 grafts, focused on the thinning areas around the temples, with a density of around 35-40 grafts per cm2. In your opinion, and based on your impressions from the pictures I have attached, does this seem a reasonable procedure? Or is the area to be covered too small, the graft density to sparse? I am 31 years old, which I assume means I have to expect further hair loss. This procedure would be followed by further procedures down the road, which I am fine with. Looking forward to your replies! /Aardvark