As of now I am a NW 3v with crown thinning (almost total coverage but definitely noticeable thinning) and more significant frontal thinning. There's no hair on the original hairline but there's reasonable coverage just a bit further back, and a little toppik produces a satisfactory appearance.
I've had consultations with 3 clinics. All three are reputable, with Clinic #2 having a reputation for high integrity and conservative treatment of hair loss. Clinic #1 has highly respected surgeons and from what I can see nothing negative said about it as concerns doing what's in the patients best interests. Clinic #3 is extremely popular and with good reason, having what seems like standout results. I did not go to Clinic #3 in person, just sent pics. Clinic #1 has in-person pics from '09, '14 and '15.
1 and 2 gave me the same recommendation: get on propecia and 1900 FUT. (I had been been on Propecia a few times since '09 but always ended stopping it and resuming later, which was a bad idea because it may have actually done something and it seems dumb to not at least try it, given its proven effects for many. I'm on it now and plant to be indefinitely). 3, the one I did not go to in person, wants to wait a year and reassess, citing future loss as a concern. Aside from not having seen me in person (maybe a big factor, obviously), I can't think of any different information that 3 would have had on which to make an assessment. I sent the pics to 3 a month after getting back on vitamin p, which has caused a shed, so maybe I was a bit thinner than, but not irregularly so. Also clinic 3 appeared to be more interested in the fact that I was a smoker than the other places. I smoked for 8 years and am a month smoke-free.
Is it normal to get conflicting recommendations from reputable doctors? Anyone else been in a similar situation?