Jump to content

brish

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brish

  1. Dear All, Please suggest me , i am considering HT very soon and very confused between selection of FUE or FUT. for FUE, i am considering Hakan Doganay Turkey & for FUT I am considering Damkerng Pathomvanich Bangkok Thailand. I have read many articles about FUE & FUT. my observation is following.. 1- FUE is costly than FUT => This is not an issue for me, somehow I will manage the money. 2- FUT left small Scar, but FUE does not. => I think scar is affordable rather living with bald head, so small scar is not an issue for me. 3- FUT is painful than FUE. => I can take pain for couple of weeks to get good hair. 4-> FUE is time consuming process, but FUT can be done in one shot. => Time is not an issue for me, I can take the operation in 3-4 days to get good hair. 5-> For FUE head shaving is required. => Thats not an issue for me, I am OK for this option too. Now in simple word, A) I need good hair with minimal risk of hair survival. B) I think my donor side is not having much hairs. I can not take the risk for 2nd surgery (if fails first FUE or FUT). C) I want good and natural hair line. D) I want my transplanted hair should survive for the long time. E) I want minimal shock loss. F) I want to cover my bald area as much as possible. I am attaching my head snap from all the required angles. Kindly suggest me. Looking forward for your reply :confused:
  2. Hi TOharbourfront How much you paid to Dr. Doganay for the HT. or in other word , I am keen to know the pricing details of Dr. Doganay thanks
  3. Dear ALL, I am considering HT for me. I am 36 year old, and suffering continuous hair loss [i think, i am Norwood IV A ]. I went in some HT clinic in and they told me that my back head donour's area is not having ample hair and they told me that upto 2700 hairs can be taken from the donor area for transplantation using FUE (hospital is more good in FUE). They also told me that since I am having less hair (2700) to move from donor area that is why a proper planning and art is required so that they can cover the bald area with less hair. I have enquired a lot on Google and on this forum to get a good surgeon for the HT. I have concluded two name for me as given below 1- Dr. Pathuri Madhu . 2- Dr. Damkerng Pathomvanich. I understood that Dr. Madhu is economic than Dr. Pathomvanich, but Dr. Pathomvanich is also offering competitive price for the surgery. discussing price is not my agenda or scope, because both are in my budget [can afford upto 3.5$]. My objective are followings 1) No mark after the surgery 2) best hair style look 3) less shock for the existing hair (don't want to loose more existing hair). 4) Good hair design so that i can get good look after a year. 5) Don't want to repeat the HT again in future. I think Dr. Pathomvanich is offering HT using REFINED OPEN TECHNIQUE and Dr. Madhu is offering using FUT/FUE. Both doctor is having good profile, but seems Dr. Pathomvanich is having better profile and enrich experience. I would like to know which is best HT technology for me either REFINED OPEN TECHNIQUE or FUE. Also please feel free to suggest me which doctor can give close match to my objectives. Thankyou very much to stay on my question, looking forward for your reply. regards brish
  4. Hey bald28, Would like to know about your HT. how are you feeling now, are feeling any issue. I am also considering HT. thanks
  5. Hi, Are you satisfied with your hair transplantation. As you have taken the surgery almost 4 years back, are you feeling any issues now.. please advice me thanks brish
×
×
  • Create New...