Jump to content

mariachi

Regular Member
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mariachi

  1. Mariachi,

     

    He did, but both the upper and lower part of the bisected follicles produced significantly thinner hair shafts. This brings up an important question: what's better, one thick hair shaft or two thin ones?

     

    Growth factors could maybe help, but they are risky. Remember that any element that increases the growth of a follicle can also increase and induce growth of unwanted tissue. For example, vegf does induce new vessel growth and could improve flow to doubled follicles. But what is stopping that same vegf form creating new life sustaining vessel growth to something else, like a tumor?

     

    In my humble opinion, we must figure out a way to achieve doubling without growth factors. Risks are simply too high otherwise.

     

    growth factors had been used for a long time, prp fpr example contains many growth

     

    factors , histogen is safe and we all know that histogen contains vegf and kgf,

     

    its all about dose, we need just very low dose

  2. blake,

     

    the science behind donor regeneration is already there, all we need is a talented doctor who can

     

    bring this technique to us

     

    dr marco toscani achieved almost 71 % regrowth for both portions( without the use of growth factors),

     

    and we all know that certains growth factors like vegf induces blood supply formation invivo,

     

    that means more nutrition for the follicles that lead to higher growth rate

     

    as for the caliber of hair , wnt10b increase hair shaft diameter

     

    http://www-hsc.usc.edu/~cmchuong/2014Wnt10b-Dkk1.pdf

     

    also vegf modulates the size of the hair follicles .

  3. I'm pretty sure this failed. A year on and seemingly no sign of any result. On the contrary, the people on various forums who have had hair doubling have had no results.

     

    I appreciate that Dr Mwamba apparently looked into this but confirmation either way would be nice. His staff have stopped responding to emails about this.

     

    He must know by now whether this works or not...

     

    man dr mwamba is still experimenting with this technique, he said that

     

    he would give a confirmation by the summer of 2015

     

    the protocols require a lot of time and we should wait

     

    12 months after that or even longer because it is a diffrent technique

     

    so we shouldn't disturb him, i know it is hard for waiting but dr mwamba is a trustworthy

     

    person and he will tell us the truth

  4. dr wesley,

     

    there is very solid science behind this technique, also the experiment or the trial above

     

    done with the tools of regular fue (which achieve 80% survival rate for the grafts)

     

    but with tools of piloscopy we might get 90% survival rate for both upper and lower

     

    parts of the follicles

     

    the disadvantage is the hair regenerated from bisected follicles is thinner than the

     

    original hair (75% of the caliber of the donor hair) , that's why dr mwamba think

     

    that growth factors would solve this issue

  5. here is the link

     

    Hair Regeneration from Transected Follicles in Duplicative

    Surgery: Rate of Success and Cell Populations Involved

     

    BACKGROUND The use of bisected hair follicles in hair transplantation has been previously reported,

    but the capacity of each half to regenerate the entire hair has not been clarified.

     

    OBJECTIVE To evaluate duplicative surgery rate of success and to analyze the cell populations involved

    in hair regeneration.

     

    METHODS We screened 28 patients undergoing duplicative surgery. Approximately 100 hair follicles

    from each patient were horizontally bisected and implanted. Upper and lower portions were stained for

    the known epithelial stem cell markers CD200, p63, b1-integrin, CD34, and K19.

     

    RESULTS Similar percentages of hair regrowth after 12 months were observed when implanting the

    upper (72.7 7 0.4%) and lower (69.2 7 1.1%) portions. Expression of CD200, p63, and b1-integrin was

    detected in both portions, whereas K19 and CD34 stained different cell populations in the upper and

    lower fragment, respectively.

     

    CONCLUSION Duplicative surgery might represent a successful alternative for hair transplantation,

    because both portions are capable of regenerating a healthy hair. Moreover, our results suggest the

    possible presence of stem cells in both halves of the follicle.

  6. dr mwamba, i found a study that made to evaluate donor doubling rate of success

     

    the study showed that the upper half has a 72% regeneration rate and the lower almost 70%

     

    and there is a photo (12 months post op) in the study which shows terminal hair growing

     

    also the caliber of the hair regenerated was finer than the original donor hair

     

    it would be appriciated to hear your opinion dr mwamba

     

    thank you

  7. blake,

    i have a question,

    according to bisection method what are the stem cells in the upper half ?

    because dr nigam posted a pic 3 months ago show that the upper half of bisected

    follicles growing after shedding on dr nigam first patient(and i think dr mwamba saw that too)

    and he (dr nigam) said that the outer root(implanted at donor) must grow new follicle

     

    i think if follicle bisected into two parts: one part has dp cells and the another has dsc cells

    it would be great idea

  8. dear dr mwamba

    this is dr gardner's(prof jahoda team) opinion regarding (invitro bisection method)

    "The best way I could think to do this would be to isolate the DP and also the lower dermal sheath, as both of these contain cells capable of generating a new follicle, although I suppose cutting the lower region of the follicle in two would work as well.

     

    But, this would be very time consuming and require a lot of donor material meaning in turn that it would be extremely expensive which is why I don't think anyone is going really take it further"

  9. dear dr mwamba

    this is dr gardner's(prof jahoda team) opinion regarding (invitro bisection method)

    "The best way I could think to do this would be to isolate the DP and also the lower dermal sheath, as both of these contain cells capable of generating a new follicle, although I suppose cutting the lower region of the follicle in two would work as well.

     

    But, this would be very time consuming and require a lot of donor material meaning in turn that it would be extremely expensive which is why I don't think anyone is going really take it further"

  10. he was supposed to present de novo doubling (apply dp cells , growth factors ,ecm) to reduce white dots

    and the hair doubling technique(bisection of the graft)

    but the thing that confuses me that dr mwamba said that his test patient didn't get any results after 5 month post op(bisection of graft) while dr mwamba saw the bisected grafts growing at the head of dr nigam patient 3 months post op

    is it possible that the telogen phase differ from person to another?

  11. I think regeneration is appearing less and less likely. Dr Mwamba seems (understandably) reluctant to comment on anything further at this stage. Of course its still early days but judging from the damming comments, failed cases (tom), and disappearance of patients it doesn't look great.

     

    well, tom himself said that dr mwamba made a hair count in brussles after the de novo procedure "second one " and there was 100 % donor regeneration

    but the situation regarding in vitro doubling is confusing

×
×
  • Create New...