Snowed

I see what you're saying. Yeah, I mean I'd rather have to BIC my head down the road than risk possible permanent ED and sexual problems. I just cannot bring myself to risk that for something like hair. Not my sex life lol. It seems that by going with a FUT I'd have more donor availability, with the risk of the scar stretching that FUE doesn't have...but I carefully chose a doctor that I trust and that is really reputable. In your opinion, maybe if I didn't go with such an aggressive hairline and just got a conservative 3500 grafts placed evenly across the front and then the mid scalp area, that would leave me with enough coverage to not look like a stellar hairline in front and then bald on the crown and mid scalp later if it did progress to such a Norwood level? I feel I'd probably have enough grafts left over to hit up the mid scalp area/crown again and have a modest hairline as I'm older if I took this route. What level Norwood did he end up progressing to? That sucks that he lost it all...but I mean if he never got a HT in the first place, wouldn't it still have all fallen out? He's just out a lot of money then on top of his hair...which really is a shame.

If I might ask, who was your surgeon? And do you think that your scar is really only susceptible to stretching while it's healing, or when it's literally just a scar do you think it can get bigger? I was wondering if you could also post a picture of your scar/donor area. I'm really interested in seeing it. A couple of more things that came to mind...I'm really, really leery of FUT anyways because of cases like that, but after looking at Dr. Rahal's track record for thin scars, I feel a *little* more comfortable letting him and only him MAYBE do a FUT. I mean I'd rather have a FUE done honestly, but like you said, donor hair is limited. Have you thought about filling in your scar with FUE? If I did go through with a FUT and then later on my hair (namely my crown, since front and mid scalp would have the donor hair implanted from a FUT) started thinning more, I could then go with a FUE...maybe for the crown and to fill in the scar at some point if it's an issue. I don't see myself having my hair so short on the back that the scar would be visible, unless the worst happened with it. By the way, thanks for getting back to me on this, all of you. It feels good hearing personally from others who have been in my shoes before.

Here are some close ups, I hope they will suffice. Now that I have some photos taken overhead, especially in the light, it's kind of weird that I can see parts of my scalp on top...from the front, you can't even tell. Maybe it's just because the light from the flash is illuminating everything. Even with just a mirror it looks thicker. Chrisdav, Now as for my future hair loss potential. I was thinking that maybe Dr. Rahal predicted this, and that's why he didn't just recommend fixing my hairline. I mean if he did the front and mid portion of my head with grafts that were not susceptible to falling out later, but somehow the ones that are there now (especially mid scalp) all fell out, I would still have transplanted hair there. Lower density perhaps, but nonetheless not completely bald. Maybe I'm overlooking something, but that's why I'm here.

Well I might as well say who it is, I don't see why not. I was looking at doing a transplant with Dr. Rahal. I've seen his FUT and FUE and both of them looked incredible. It was mentioned by past patients that he goes pretty aggressive over being conservative. It seems that he's gotten a lot of praise here as well. I took Procerin and Provillus, neither really did much for my temples. Never used Rogaine because the crown covers pretty well with my hair above a #4. I probably should use it though. I know for certain I will never try Propecia, because I would never want to risk the sexual side effects, no matter how small the chances are. That pretty much leaves my only option for the front temples as a transplant. I'm aware that in the future, I may lose more hair, but looking at my dad and the rest of my family, it doesn't go much past the temples and maybe a little crown. I don't think anyone is full blown bald, or even close to it. I mean I'd still have more donor hair even after 3500 grafts, if I ever needed it in the future. Not sure if anyone who has had a FUT would recommend a FUE instead, but looking at the scar and scalp tightness, it kind of horrifies me. I think it's a good idea to not take some chance of the back of my head becoming disfigured...I mean not all these can go perfect, right?

Hey everyone, I've skimmed these forums for a while, and I finally made an account as I'm trying to go through with a hair transplant. I'm 23 years old and decided I wanted to get a FUE transplant done. I emailed one of the advisors for a hair transplant surgeon (listed on this site, not sure if I'm supposed to just toss their name out there.) Anyways I mentioned I was only interested in a FUE, and I got a return email with a plan from the surgeon that is a FUT procedure. Also, it was recommended 3500 hair grafts for nearly @15,000 dollars total after tax. I was looking for some advice on whether this is way too many grafts for my hair being how it is. I got rated as a Norwood 3A. It also doesn't seem to make sense that he only wanted to work on the front and mid-scalp, when my hair is thinning on the crown and receding on the temples. In the pics, I combed up the hair where it's receded to kind of show it more. It seems like the mid-scalp is actually the best part right now. Any suggestions or thoughts would be appreciated.