Jump to content

PupDaddy

Senior Member
  • Posts

    610
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PupDaddy

  1. So Dr. Maral is not even on the premises while his technicians complete hair restoration surgeries!?!?

     

    First we learn that Dr. Maral "supervises" all aspects of the FUE surgery, which his technicians perform from start to finish. Now we learn that the good doctor heads home for dinner while his (hourly rate) technicians are still operating on patients. Some supervision! And, apparently, the doctor's parting words to the techs as he heads out the door are "finish up quick," so he won't have to pay them for additional hours of work. The shady practices of this clinic become more and more alarming.

  2. As someone new to this concept (relatively small FUE transplant) I'm getting the impression that "techs" are doing far more of the work than doctors want to admit. How does one actually get qualified as a technician in an industry lacking various regulations?

     

    They are like stand-ins in any profession where it's hard to gauge their quality beforehand. Most look young and some don't even seem to have nursing backgrounds. Motor skills and intelligence varies widely, regardless of training. These transplants require subtle abilities to discern angles and depths, and I don't want amateurs messing with something this delicate! We should be offered the credentials of anyone who's going to be involved in these very personal surgeries.

     

    While I agree that FUE clinics should be transparent about the role that technicians will play in the procedure, you should know that this case was FUT/strip, not FUE (H&W doesn't offer FUE), and that contrary to the misimpression created by the patient that started this thread, Dr. Wong personally performed the surgery, not his technicians. Dr. Wong surgically extracted the strip, sutured or surgically stapled the wound closed, and, using custom cut and sized blades, made all of the recipient sites for the grafts to be seated in. The technicians' role was limited to the routine, technical tasks of dissecting the strip into follicular units and then seating the grafts into the graft recipient sites that had been cut by Dr. Wong.

     

    Just thought you should know, as it may have been difficult to determine this given the length of the thread and the various tangents it has taken.

  3. I recall Joe Tillman telling us that your clinic was using a method to remove the punched follicular units from the donor that is supposed to be less traumatic on the grafts than other methods (e.g., forceps). Joe was going to fill us in about it but I believe that he and your clinic have since parted ways. Assuming that I am remembering correctly, do you have information about this graft removal method you can share?

  4. Looking REALLY good at 4 months, jkm3! Love how the hairline is shaping up. Looks like Dr. Diep did you and himself proud.

     

    As you know, not only will more hairs sprout as the months go on, but as the transplanted hairs cycle through their growth stages, they will mature, fatten up, and become better "trained" to the angles and directions they were implanted.

     

    Please continue to update us.

  5. I think Results are what matters , we have read about doctors doing the extractions and the Technicians doing the rest .... YET Poor Results , and I have seen at Dr. edrogan the Nurse doing the extractions and YET Super Results

     

    You are missing one of the main points here: The clinic in question isn't just having techs do all the extractions and seating of the grafts in recipient sites. It is even having technicians create all the recipient sites!! The creation of the recipient sites is the heart-and-soul of ultra refined hair restoration surgery. We have NEVER read of this and we have NEVER read of ANY clinic -- and certainly have not recommended one -- that removes the surgeon from the procedure entirely and allows non-physician technicians to perform the entire hair restoration surgery, from start to finish. In fact, from what I can gather, the physician who owns the clinic in question has no experience performing hair restoration surgeries at all and merely hired a team of technicians to perform hair transplants as a second profit center. This is the kind of clinic that we should recommend to members or even grant Coalition status to?

  6. Pup.

    Abcd is around the 12 month mark is his a good bad or inferior HT.

     

    The quality of abcd's self-taken photos are so poor that I am unable to tell anything about his 10-month progress other than he appears to have some hair on top of his head. His crown and vertex are obviously thin, judging from the single relatively clear photo of that area. The rest is unknown. There are no clear, properly lit, close-up photos of the hairline work or of the top, temples, or sides. It is impossible to tell whether this single case is quality work, comparable to that of the body of work posted by recommended clinics and their patients. One thing is for certain: no ht physician or clinic has been recommended here based on a single case, and if the poor, blurry photos of this lone 10-month result is the best that can be offered on behalf of the FUE work being turned out by the technicians working for the Maral Klinic, I would say that your idea of a separate recommendation status for technician-only FUE clinics is moot anyway.

  7. I think that whether Dr maral has sufficient experience personally performing HT surgery and that he feels that the training,experience and results his team are producing are of a high standard.are of paramount concern and he obviously thinks they are.

     

     

    How would one conclude that "high standards" are the "paramount concern" of a surgeon, be it Dr. Maral or another surgeon, who would turn a cosmetic surgery over to a group of non-physician technicians while the surgeon is doing god knows what and whose only involvement is an occasional walk-by to ask if everything is going okay?

     

    It seems to me that if high standards were the paramount concern, either the surgeon would dedicate himself/herself to learning and perfecting top-notch hair transplantation and/or hire the finest hair transplant surgeon available to perform these procedures for the clinic. At the very least, the surgeon should assist in putting the purportedly talented head technician through medical school. Oh, wait -- if any of these steps were taken, the surgeon couldn't leverage cheap, non-physician labor into a veritable hair transplant factory.

     

    You keep referring to "results [Dr. Maral's] team are producing" being of a "high standard." What results are you talking about? Immediate post-op is not a "result." I have yet to see a single result (12-18 months post op, or even 8-12 months post op) of this clinic, let alone a body of results that would allow an assessment of the consistency and quality of the work being turned out. Even if acceptable results could eventually be provided, I still would oppose the recommendation of any clinic where hair restoration surgeries are preformed entirely by non-physician technicians.

  8. OK I will just run a scenario by you for your input if you would please?

     

    Dr Koray erdogan decides he wants to step back and just have a supervising role during procedures.

    He trains his technicians personally and feels 100% confident in their capabilities.

    They carry on with this setup and produce results that both Dr erdogan and his patients are very happy with should he have his recommendation revoked here?

    /QUOTE]

     

    In my opinion, yes. If a ht surgeon can't be bothered to AT LEAST create the recipient sites for the FUE grafts, I do no believe that surgeon or his/her clinic ought to be recommended by this site. Personally, I would prefer that the surgeon be required to perform the extractions and to place/seat at least the hairline grafts, but I am afraid that ship has sailed. I would absolutely draw the line at a clinic allowing the cosmetically and artistically critical task of creating the recipient sites to be passed off to a technician.

  9. Dr. Maral performs his aesthetic surgery operations at other times when there are no HT operations or after they finish.

     

    Then why does Dr. Maral not directly participate in the clinic's FUE hair transplant surgeries?

     

    Has Dr. Maral ever performed FUE hair transplant surgeries? For how long? How many?

     

    When did the Maral Klinic start offering FUE hair transplant surgeries performed entirely by technicians? Where did these technicians come from? Who trained them? What is their experience?

  10. Everything Blake said, x 10. Hair transplantation is a cosmetic surgery, be it FUE or FUT. Removing the surgeon entirely from hands-on involvement in the surgery is a bad, bad idea -- on many levels, a number of which Blake already touched on. Bottom-basement pricing for technician-performed FUE hair transplantation might "benefit" some patients in the short run and only in the sense of immediate cost, but the long term consequences and costs (financial and otherwise) are potentially disastrous and devastating.

     

    Something else being given short shrift here is that with Turkish FUE mills like the Maral Klinic, not only do non-physisian technicians do all the fu extractions and fu implantations/seatings, THE TECHNICIANS ALSO CREATE/CUT ALL THE RECIPIENT INCISIONS FOR THE EXTRACTED FU'S!! To make this cosmetically critical task "easier" and "faster" for the tech, the clinic provides the tech with a motorized drillI to make the recipient sites!! I have NEVER heard of this being done anywhere, and, as KO noted, this assembly line, techs-only approach to hair transplantation is taking things to an absurd level.

     

    It seems apparent that clinics such as the Maral Klinic have started offering FUE hair transplantation as a second profit center to the physician's cosmetic surgery practice. While the surgeon busies himself with rhinoplasties and facelifts, a group of techs churn out hair transplantations at cut-rate prices made possible by this business model. Patients are then encouraged by the clinic to post their "results" here, but the only results we see aren't results at all, but rather are immediate post-op pics only showing that a transplant recently occurred -- indicating that the clinic only recently started offering these technician-performed FUE transplants such that actual grown-in, matured results are as yet non-existent, or that such results have proven to be deficient.

     

    I can't conceive that this forum would put up such an outfit for recommendation, let alone that recommendation would be granted.

  11. FueSoon,

     

    None of the Coalition physicians or recommended physicians on this forum use the Neograft machine to extract graphs, and two who purchased an ARTAS machine for this task no longer use it. Why? Because the top, experienced FUE physicians have learned that there are no "robotic" shortcuts to the tedious process of individually punching out (excising and extracting) follicular units without damaging them. Both the Neograft and ARTAS have proven deficient in yielding viable graphs compared to hand punching by skilled practitioners. The top FUE docs and/or their technicians punch out and extract the graphs by hand, using either manual punches or one of a variety of hand-held motorized punch systems.

     

    Keep researching, and if at all possible, don't limit your choice of surgeon to your immediate locale. People routinely travel great distances, or even fly around the world, to be worked on by the best hair transplant physicians. A poor transplant can have lifelong negative consequences. We only have a precious, finite supply of donor graphs. Don't risk squandering them with an inexperienced local physician who has purchased an FUE robot as an "easy" entry into hair transplantation.

     

    Good luck!

  12. Dear PupDaddy,

     

    I was just warned by the moderator not to post results until I am considered for recommendation. I didn't know that doctors were not allowed to post results if they are not recommended, so I will respect the rules and wait for Bill to have a look at my patient results that I sent him. I have immediately after photos showing the incisions but I will not post anymore until I am allowed to.

     

    Regards,

    Dr. Ali Emre Karadeniz

     

    Understood, doc. I will be on the lookout for postings of your work if you seek recommendation and Bill decides to propose you to the community for recommendation.

×
×
  • Create New...