strypp

oh... well, it seems like either the 50cm2 density that the doctor inserted did not totally survive, the grafts inserted into the existing hair damaged the existing hair follicles and/or set them into their non-growth period, or 50 grafts/cm2 density was not enough given your hair characteristics to not give the see through scalp look don't fret this is fixable consult with some docs realize sometimes this happens and may not be due to the doctor you have chosen

davis91: great responses thanks! it is reported by some that FUE has a lower survival rate (yield) than the strip method not to worry i bet any of the top docs who specialize in hairlines would add to what you have consult with rahal i hear he does hairlines pretty good

i asked the same question on another forum and got the same non answer (but for the true and dorin answer) one doc says anything over 40grafts/cm2 per session will compromise blood supply and graft survival.... another says he could do up to 65grafts/cm2 per session but if you want more density you can do so in another procedure this is an "in general" question and is practice specific not patient specific so pics are not needed just like one doctor recommending 1000 grafts for a specific area and another recommending 2000 it seems to be a straight forward question, at least true and dorin answered it directly, at least for their practice

do you have any before pics of the hairline and the temples? were the new grafts implanted into completely bald areas or into thinning areas? the temple points look really good. were they moved in as well?