Jump to content

Cyzkm

Regular Member
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cyzkm

  1. On 3/5/2024 at 1:49 PM, gxm100 said:

    The answer to that is that it's just a factor of the population getting a hair transplant and when it is advisable to get a hair transplant. If you are getting 1k or less, that is indicative that the area needing to be covered is relatively speaking very small meaning that there isn't much hair loss. For many people this indicates that they are both young and have little loss - not a good candidate for transplant as there is not evidence of what will happen as of yet into later decades.

    Think of how many people don't have significant hair loss til they're in their mid 30s or even mid 40s or in many cases (actually my dad included) into their mid 60s. If you need such a small area covered that 1k grafts would be sufficient and you're only 25 and you go ahead and do that, well that would be a bad idea if your hairline really starts going back in another 10 years and now you have these 1k grafts real low down.

    So it's not really about the # of grafts, it's about a combination of age and progress of loss. Younger people that currently need 1k or less shouldnt do HT yet as you don't know the future. People that wait until the appropriate time to get a HT rarely only need 1k. And then people who are lucky enough to make it well into the later decades and still only need 1k would probably frequently decide it's not worth going through at all.

    Essentially ya just can't do much with 1k

     

    Interesting yea I still kind of want to do it  for one side of the hairline but it would not be many grafts. It still looks good from the front but I don’t like the way it looks from the side
     

     

    IMG_4790.png

  2. 2 hours ago, hairman4321 said:

    Something interesting I've noticed for awhile now. Below is a picture of a hair I cut off near the tip (not near the root). See how on one end its thick for a small distance, and then it goes thinner? That thick tip was the outer most section of the hair, I think an original graft which didn't shed. It's interesting how it gets thinner and then sort of thicker again. Initially I thought it was that the hairs from the donor were taking on the hair quality on the hairline (thinner) but it seems to thicken up a bit. Maybe the stress from the operation provided less nutrients (well, most of them were shedding completely anyway).

     

    20240306_160217.thumb.jpg.201d3476124800253dd2c14a127cecc2.jpg

    Have u shed these hairs before? I’ve read that the hairs need to go through a few growth cycles to look normal. 

  3. 38 minutes ago, FormerFutureKrillin said:

    For what it’s worth, I was able to track down the reddit post you referenced earlier about the techs - that post described my experience to a T (right down to the painful last bit of the procedure). In hindsight, I have come to strongly suspect that the techs that were staffed on my surgery day were rushing to finish my surgery as fast as possible for whatever reason. My surgery was finished extremely quickly for its size (a tech even said as much as they went out the door when I was finished), which I think contributed to some of my issues.

    I still believe Dr. Bloxham is a good and ethical doctor. But there are more people involved in the surgery than just him, and he’s ultimately responsible for the team. 

    From my research, I agree with the two posts above that my case appears to be an outlier in terms of the result, so I guess weight my opinion accordingly however you want. But in my opinion the mistakes that were made in my case were extremely egregious - mistakes that fly in the face of Bloxham’s own HT philosophy stated on his YouTube channel.

    Yea for example this guy had 3100 grafts and got a great result. 

     

  4. 10 hours ago, JoeD said:

    I find this very interesting regarding Bloxham.  Before the 2 to 3 cases I have seen online between here and Reddit this year, I had never seen anything negative/concerning on him.  Thought he was considered top-tier. Certainly plenty of excellent outcomes shown on here and elsewhere, perplexing why there is the occasional miss.  

    Which outcomes are you referring to? to me he seems very knowledgeable and responsive so I’m surprised to see complaints. These were the two negative outcomes I found 
     

    ( Reddit link removed )

     

     

     

     

  5. I also showed him the photos of the hairline design from the local place and he thought it was a terrible design and too feminine, because the corner curbed down. 
     

    He explained what he would do if there were to be a procedure which was basically the same as what dr Bloxham said. He just didn’t think the result would be different enough to the average person to be worth it at this stage. 
     

     

  6. He said that right now it would likely be too subtle to be worth it in terms of having the surgery.  He said that when the body got used to not having something there would be a shock and a shed, and it was likely that I would get it Back after being on the medicine again for a few months, and we could do a follow up in 3 months to see. He thought I was too worried about it 

     

    he said to take some photos now and come back and evaluate in 3 months 

    • Like 1
  7. 2 hours ago, HappyMan2021 said:

    The best factor in surgery success is surgeon skill level. But even then luck is a factor. Even the good surgeons have misses. 

    Generally speaking, even a great surgeon cannot give 'end-satisfactory result' density just in 1 surgery

    It is very common to need 2-3 surgeries to give great density

    For low norwoods, I would say the density issue - followed by further hairloss - are the 2 most common reasons to need more surgery (not including getting botched, which is also sadly common and can completely your journey)

    Yea I can see why density would end up being an issue but depends on lightning. I am seeing some insane results from dr pekiner but he has a very long wait list. 

  8. 56 minutes ago, HappyMan2021 said:

    a traditional side part. I suppose the non-parted side may have balding visible, but I really don't think it will be conspicuous to anyone but you

     

     

    the example you showed is a common result for 1 HT even if you go to a good surgeon. Most guys need 2-3 HTs over their lifetime, and that is just if they have moderate MPB AND that all those surgeries go well

    I do think you are qualified to begin your hair transplant journey if you can't cope otherwise, but you really shouldnt begin this journey if you can't accept that multiple hair transplants are part of the deal

    How did that guy get such a poor result when the guy in the video I posted ended up with corners that matched his real hair as far as I could tell? A better way of putting it would be, what factors determine the probability of getting a good result? Or is it because those grafts were spread over a smaller area whereas in the Reddit post the entire hairline was lowered. 

×
×
  • Create New...