Jump to content

coscanoer

Regular Member
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by coscanoer

  1. So sorry to hear it pal. Like you I wish I found this site before my procedure. All I can say is bury it; move forward, get another procedure with a Coalition doctor or just forget about it. There are other options besides HTs but it really would depend on your situation. Point is you can come out of this a winner in the end.

  2. In my opinion naturalness is just as important, if not moreso, than density in getting a good-looking HT. The thin singles in your hairline may be the bane of your existence now, but you might not feel the same way if your hairline had thick 2s and 3s in it, that would stand out to the eye when seen in conjunction with your overall low-density hair.

     

    If I were in your shoes I'd mostly leave the front two rows alone, and look to add density from the 3rd row back. This will make you look reasonably thick, yet natural. You have thinner hair and a bald-spot; a wall-of-hair hairline would look "wrong".

  3. I always had a high forehead since I was a kid, but I wore my hair fairly long and parted in the middle from age 10 to 17 before cutting it really short, at which point I noticed for the first time how high and vertex-y my hairline really was. Now that I look back, it's apparent that my hairline receded to a solid NW3 between age 10 and 14 or 15, in a pure recession pattern with essentially no diffuse thinning, and then just stopped. It never dawned on me until I was 25 that I had had MPB hairloss super-young. Weird.

  4. Originally posted by dakota3:

    Dr. Charles,

    Did this reasonable plan include a HT? If so why? That bald, that young should be turned away IMO!

     

    Why? The concern with doing HTs young is the fear of having more hairloss in the future. If this guy's already Kojak then I'm not sure what's the difference. I'm sure Dr. Charles would appropriately go conservative and there can't be much more to lose.

  5. A hypothesis I just came up with: If a strip scar can stretch over the year following surgery, could not the small FUE dot-scars also stretch in the same way, resulting in slightly-larger dots that overall leave a thinner overall appearance to the donor region? Even a 10-20% increase in the size of the dots would result in significantly fewer FU per cm2.

     

    Possible?

  6. It's definitely the smart decision to play it conservative with the crown. You will be thankful down the line. I think that you can get decent coverage with like 10 FU/cm2 and, combined with some concealer, make it look like you more or less have a reasonably thick crown. Or you can leave it altogether. Also, transplanting hair is a one-way action. If you add less hair to an area, and you find you are satisfied, then you are done. However if you add too many grafts or a ton don't grow, you can never undo that.

  7. RTC, there wasn't any shockloss. There's my old hairline, then the transplanted area, and the part of the transplanted area that borders my old hairline just doesn't have many hairs in it.

     

    PGP, with regards to those links: icon_frown.gif .

     

    Wantego, thanks for the link, I'll read it now.

  8. Thanks Wantego. By all means, share any threads you want. I agree with you about the need to vent and discuss, it just feels like some clinics invite discussion and questioning while others shut it down. If there are a bunch of guys who are upset and had bad results, why are they not posting? I'm not saying I will end up with bad results when all is said and done, but I am willing to discuss my progress and outcomes and let's get these guys to add to the discussion here too.

×
×
  • Create New...