-
Posts
29 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Profiles
Store
Gallery
Articles
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by PaulB79
-
-
Clearly, this somewhat directed at me since my reply was the only one that wasn't exactly 'positive'.
Guess you missed the sarcasm implicit in my post.
-
Wrong thread, dude.
-
A scar search series on patients with buzzed back and sides after FUT, that would be an interesting challenge. All the patients in the scar search videos have medium length hair.
-
- Haters state that thread has backfired on Dr #1 and that he will now go out of business
- Dr #1 laughs at the haters as business is better than ever
Sorry buddy but that never happened, you slipped into the realms of poetic license!
-
So to the OP, do you really want to make us go through this again?
Yes.
-
Thanks Bill for spanking my virtual botty. I was a very naughty boy for ever doubting your unerring wisdom. May the hair gods have mercy on my soul.
-
.....if you want to buzz your hair short on the back and sides. Discuss.
-
-
It's so far been ignored (obviously) and will likely stay that way.
-
I made a valid question, buddy.
-
I'm not running for president
That is truly our loss!
-
I don't believe exposure to air does them damage. I cut many pieces in advance and keep them in a pill box. I find using a knife to cut them is best and cut them into four pieces and discard any significantly smaller ones. Cutting the pills into smaller than four is too difficult without a lot of crumbling.
-
Konior is the man!
-
Spex (and Dr Lindsey):
So the healing scabbed areas represent where the M-FUE procedure was performed?
How many follicle unit grafts were removed from each M-FUE extraction? Dr Bloxham told me he averages around 45 in patients who have not had previous surgery. Is this consistent with your (Dr Lindsey) results?
I'm impressed by the amount of scarring left after removing this many follicle unit grafts at once.
The scarring looks worse than FUE scarring - much bigger areas of scar
-
... doesn't look like its a very difficult procedure to perform surgically
-
If you want short haircuts FUE is better. The strip scar is often an issue at that length.
-
Dr Feller told me that the doner area had been pretty ravaged during Dr Bhatti's procedure so another strip surgery would not be possible for me. I was gutted. However all was not lost Dr Feller suggested his collegue Dr William Lindsey (Dr L) could perform a procedure called MFUE which stands for Modified FUE- where we could harvest anything from 500-800 grafts for transplantation. Having had 2 previous strip surgeries with Dr Feller i can honestly say he is for me an honest, trustworthy and skilled surgeon and i had no hesitations in moving forward with the MFUE with Dr L.!
So Dr Feller claimed that another strip would be impossible. But here he claims that strip after FUe is possible --- http://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/eve/182519-failed-fue-need-advice-2.html
"So what to do? Simple. Switch to the FUT procedure. This procedure does not traumatize the grafts. So even very physiologically fragile grafts have a far far greater chance of surviving the transplant process and growing.
In my patient described above he had virtually no growth from his FUE (performed elsewhere though I don't remember where that was), but after the FUT he had virtually 100% growth. We just did a second procedure on him using FUT as well. While we did have to work through a lot of FUE scarring, it really isn't a problem for a skilled team of technicians. "
So which is it? Possible after FUE or not???
-
Understood. Thank you.
way to cave
-
Any recommendations please? has anyone here gone to Thailand for it? Thnx!!!!
-
I'm thinking of going to Dr Bhatti
-
Why I'd never get a strip op -- I want short back and sides.
-
FUE because I want to shave down. Neither strip nor mFUE lets you do that.
-
Dr Feller
David,First of all there is absolutely no question as to what I did or didn't write so please don't make it out to seem subjective.
I proved why that's a false statement in my post earlier today but you've ignored me.
While you may be acutely aware that Seth is a patient of Dr. Bhatti, I was not. I don’t read and frequent this site as you do. I had no idea who Dr. Bhatti was until he and California attacked me out of the blue, much less what Sethicles specific past included. I had no idea who California was either Yes, I can now read that Dr. Bhatti is in Seth's signature line, but I had no idea of this at the time. You made a wrong assumption, and so did they.When I brought up that Seth was a rep for an FUE doctor it was in the context of responding to a scathing and inappropriate post by HTsoon. It had nothing to do with Dr. Bhatti nor anyone else. This is plain to anybody who takes the time to read it, which nobody has. That question I asked to HTsooner that you quoted here had nothing to do with Dr. Bhatti or any other doctor
in existence.
To me Seth has come across as a rep for an FUE doctor or the FUE industry in general since the very second post of this thread. And clearly many others thought this too long before I ever did to the point that Bill told me he had even investigated Seth for it in the past. So my belief that he was a rep for an FUE doctor is valid, but I never said who he was a rep for because I didn’t know, didn’t care, and it was not important to the point I was making to HTsooner.
You insult the community's intelligence by making these risible excuses. To claim you hadn't read Sethticle's signature, mentioning Dr Bhatti's name, while simultaneously making an allegation that he is a rep is very implausible. You must have spent hours on your threads here and are obviously very emotionally committed to them. I don't believe you formed an opinion about one of your arch enemies here - Sethticles - without reading his signature. You obviously do "care" about it.
“I present this not to challenge you on it but I don't see any other interpretation and I'd like to know if you can see how I and others may have drawn this conclusion.”If I had written that Seth was a rep for Dr. Bhatti I might see how you could draw your conclusion. But since I never did, then NO, I can’t see how you and others may have drawn this wrong conclusion. I also don't see how false assumptions made by anybody should become my burden to disprove.
The reality of this false charge against me should be confirmed by a moderator, and I would suggest a post be inserted after California and Dr. Bhatti's original posts that states that their charge against me was unverifiable and fallacious. They clearly won't do the honorable thing and remove the false statements themselves. Would you make that post, David?
I've explained how we draw the conclusion.
-
Dr Feller
Your silence is deafening.
Paul
Feller Medical and Hasson & Wong Hair Transplants
in Hair Transplant Reviews
Posted
Boo hoo. Do you never stop whining?