Jump to content

GreatPelo

Senior Member
  • Posts

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GreatPelo

  1. I think in order to guide you correctly you should add pictures to study your hair loss pattern. If you have an aggressive hair loss pattern, you should lean towards the FUT method, considering you'll get more yield, more coverage. Once you're close to your goal, you can turn to FUE, not only touch up remaining areas, but also to add to your linear scar and diminish scarring if you were left with a thicker than normal scar. Every patient is different...not all patients are candidates for the FUE method.

  2. Britboy, I'm sorry you didn't have a successful FUT experience...but to state that FUT is outdated is an incorrect statement in your part. Every patient is different....not every patient should have an FUE surgery just like not every patient is a candidate for hair transplant to begin with.

     

    After reading such a thorough article from the ISHRS, the most renowned hair transplant educational board in the world, and then say FUT is outdated leads me to believe you've based your opinion solely on your experience. That doesn't mean the same can apply to others....

  3. Patients with multiple future procedures are best to use the strip. You're a future NW 5...so I think you're on target with the FUT with trychophytic closure. Everything above and under that scar will be as thick as when you were born. With FUE and multiple surgeries, your donor can start to become diffused. Doesn't make sense to help thicken front mid and crown areas while diffusing donor.

     

    Best of luck!

  4. someone above recommended 3000-3500. I think it's too much considering you still have some native hair and don't want to over do it, resulting in hurting current hair, not to mention some new grafts may fight for blood due to overloading transplants, resulting in some of them not taking. I'd probably do from 2000-2200 and of course get on propecia asap. If you need a touch up in the future, which you probably will do to your age, then you go for more density. It's taken you a while to lose your hair, you're not going to get it all back in one shot.

  5. You don't have a terrible pluggy look. Frontal hairline can be softened with fine one hair grafts and then give you density behind hairline. Also, someone above mentioned you should do FUE because the strip will give you another scar??? Wrong! You already have a linear scar. An experienced hair surgeon will take the new strip above or under the current one, remove the old scar...and leave only one scar. I also don't believe you only have 1600 grafts left as donor. Maybe you can only harvest 1600 on your next surgery...but you do seem to have more for the future if needed.

     

    Best of luck!

  6. YoshiYo,

     

    I have to agree with HairWeare....the benefit of this site is for people to use it as a research tool in order to help them make the best possible decision on who they choose....not afterward. However, from what you stated and knowing personally who these folks are, consider yourself another of the numerous patients in this industry who's surgery is totally performed by a technician, while the Doctor only pats you on the shoulder to see how you're doing. Florida state law requires a licensed medical doctor to cut into skin....while harvesting and making the receptive sites where grafts are placed. Technicians should separate and place grafts. MORESO WHEN YOU'VE INVESTED A GREAT DEAL OF HARD EARNED MONEY....but are treated solely by a technician instead of a doctor. I ask myself what the doctor was doing while the tech was performing the entire surgery?

     

    In addition, if ron (the salesman) told you he got his result from FUE....don't believe him. His hair was done at MHR where I first met him as a patient. He puts his before and after pictures on the website to impress patients about the Neograft but it's pretty unethical considering 95% of his result was done by other doctors when he worked at MHR.

     

    Not wanting to rain on anyone's parade....but honesty and facts rule! This being said, I pray you obtain great results.

  7. Laser Cap is the least effective of medical therapies. First and best is Propecia (it's a personal decision to use it but doesn't have any side effects in case you want to have kids, etc), then Rogaine and then Laser treatment, which is most effective when used with other two therapy choices. Don't want to be negative but I'm not convinced these folks guided you correctly....

     

    *Sold you a $2k laser (Finsateride - propecia generic - is cheapest and most effective - $2.50/month)

    *Didn't follow through with game plan promised (Artas instead of handheld)

    *Tech harvesting donor (should've been the doctor)

    *Over estimated number of grafts (2500+ way too much for you)

    *Not much of a difference in before/after for money, donor and time invested.

     

    Don't mean to throw them under the bus, but too many factors here that don't equate to a positive patient experience. I would consider speaking to another specialist....

     

    Best of luck!

  8. Not your fault at all, Wazaam. But very disappointed for the industry as a whole. Although the tech was nice, you didn't pay to be entertained...you paid for RESULTS! Artas and Neograft both sell their units to doctors and make a very handsome profit (Artas for about $225k and Neograft for about $85k)...but it doesn't end there. Did you know they each make a $1/graft royalty that the doctor has to pay them? Guess who pays for this? PATIENTS! Not only are royalties involved in the fast food industry like McDonalds, but now in the hair restoration industry, which I find repulsive. So these big companies take their huge money and pour it into Adword ads on Google and major marketing to pull demand and interests from patients who, unfortunately, are not very seasoned with all that's involved.

     

    I'm all for the advancement of technology and methods....but not at the cost of the patient!!

  9. There is absolutely NO WAY a patient with your amount of hair should've been recommended 2500+ grafts. Way too much! When transplanting new grafts, they have to have a certain amount of space from others to ensure they receive enough blood to survive. By transplanting too close, can not only cause new graft to receive too little blood, but can also cause damage to native follicles in the area.

     

    I will bet who ever performed this procedure was not a specialist....and even allowed techs to do all or most of the surgery, including harvesting and site creation. Was the doctor very involved? Are they a specialist or do hair restoration as one more of their numerous services?

×
×
  • Create New...