Jump to content

The difference between DHI and FUE?


Recommended Posts

  • Regular Member

Hi guys! I am looking into getting a hair transplant with Dr C**** and they suggested getting a DHI transplant, is there any benefit getting this one compared to the FUE? Looking forward to hearing back :) 

thanks,

brad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

DHI is a form of FUE.

With standard FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction), incisions are made in the recipient site and then the grafts are placed into those incision holes.

With DHI (Direct Hair Implantation), grafts are loaded into implanter pens and implanted into the recipient site without needing to create incision holes first. Since DHI eliminates the step of creating the recipient sites it is usually a faster method.

Neither method is "better". It all depends on the Dr or technicians skill with the method they are using. Don't look for a hair transplant surgeon based only on what method they use. Choose one based on their results. It's just as likely to have a transplant disaster with either method if the person working on you is not skilled enough.

 

  • Like 2

Al

Forum Moderator

(formerly BeHappy)

I am a paid forum moderator for hairrestorationnetwork.com. I am not a Dr. and I do not work for any particular Dr. My opinions are my own and may not reflect the opinions of other moderators or the owner of this site. I am also a hair transplant patient and repair patient. You can view some of my repair journey here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Regular Member

I saw another member said he doesn’t want to do surgery with pre-made slits. Some top surgeons do pre-made and others DHI. The guy his motive was with pre made slits surgery is especially done by the techs or something and that transection rate is higher then with DHI? Is this correct? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
On 6/28/2024 at 4:25 AM, SY7 said:

I saw another member said he doesn’t want to do surgery with pre-made slits. Some top surgeons do pre-made and others DHI. The guy his motive was with pre made slits surgery is especially done by the techs or something and that transection rate is higher then with DHI? Is this correct? 

 

The transection rate shouldn't be any different. It shouldn't matter whether the Dr is making the incision ahead of time or if he's making it at the time of implantation with the implanter pen. Everyone is allowed to have their preferences. If you want to go with DHI that's totally fine. I'll just basically repeat what I said in the previous post. Don't just go to a Dr who does DHI simply because he does DHI. I would try researching a number of places that use that method and then pick the one you feel is best for you. Remember, the skill of the person/people performing the hair transplant is more important, as far as getting a great result, than whether or not they use DHI or pre made slits.

 

  • Like 2

Al

Forum Moderator

(formerly BeHappy)

I am a paid forum moderator for hairrestorationnetwork.com. I am not a Dr. and I do not work for any particular Dr. My opinions are my own and may not reflect the opinions of other moderators or the owner of this site. I am also a hair transplant patient and repair patient. You can view some of my repair journey here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Senior Member
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SY7 said:

 

This doctor says he thinks it is better because of better depth control, placement and securement of grafts? 

i think the consens is that you need less training and skills with implanter pens compared to forceps in order to not kill the graft which in my opinion means that the implater pen is superior because chances of mistake are simply lower.

 

i recently read that other surgeons also use a device which is called keep which goes into the direction of implanter

 

on the other hand i can imagine some surgeon prefer forceps because it gives them a better view on the matter

 

arr dr.zarev or dr. munib using implanter pen?

Edited by mr_peanutbutter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Regular Member

I can understand the pen assisting with (or maintaining consistency of) the depth of insertion. 

What do you all think about pens and the insertion angle? Is it just a matter of what angle the pen is held at as the hair is injected? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Regular Member
8 hours ago, mr_peanutbutter said:

i think the consens is that you need less training and skills with implanter pens compared to forceps in order to not kill the graft which in my opinion means that the implater pen is superior because chances of mistake are simply lower.

 

i recently read that other surgeons also use a device which is called keep which goes into the direction of implanter

 

on the other hand i can imagine some surgeon prefer forceps because it gives them a better view on the matter

 

arr dr.zarev or dr. munib using implanter pen?

I saw, at least in one vídeo, that Zarev does use an implanter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...