Jump to content

Case performed by Dr. Feriduni – 3198 FU in 1 procedure


Recommended Posts

  • Senior Member

FUE performed on a 35-year old patient with

• NW IV, Class N
• Donor density of 80 FU/cmÇ occipital, 80 FU/cmÇ parietal, 80 FU/cmÇ temporal
• Hair diameter of ~ 46-47 microns

Treatment plan
Follicular Unit Extraction to attain an aesthetic reconstruction of the hairline and midhead section.

Performed procedure
FUE (November 23, 2021)
Follicular Unit Extraction with 3198 FU:
* 430 single hair FU
* 2104 double hair FU
* 664 triple hair FU
HGI: 2,1

Parallel incisions in custom-sized blades technique (Cutting Edge blades of 0,8 - 1,0 mm).
Extraction performed by WAW-system with a 0.85 mm serrated trumpet punch.

No microscopic preparation of the follicular unit grafts.

WR1.jpg

WR2.jpg

WR3.jpg

WR4.jpg

WR5.jpg

WR6.jpg

WR7.jpg

WR8.jpg

WR9.jpg

Edited by L0ke
  • Well Done 1

L0ke - Representative for Dr. Feriduni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Regular Member

The results are good no doubt. Donor also looks good.  Donor has fine hair so I don't know if he can get much in 2nd surgery.

Probably because of his fine hair even with 3200 grafts and a decent area of implantation , the density came out to be good and not great. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Regular Member
4 hours ago, duckling said:

The results are good no doubt. Donor also looks good.  Donor has fine hair so I don't know if he can get much in 2nd surgery.

Probably because of his fine hair even with 3200 grafts and a decent area of implantation , the density came out to be good and not great. 

The trouble with fine hair is you need more density to look thick, and that means you need more grafts in the recipient but it also means you can afford to take fewer grafts from the donor before it looks thin there. And it’s more expensive in terms of money, and the grafts are more delicate.

Result here looks very natural though, and seems to have a good density. Is there a reason grafts were not prepared with a microscope?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Senior Member
3 hours ago, andy_+_+ said:

This is a great result, how many graphs does he have left? 

Thank you so much.
His total donor capacity after the treatment is +- 9000.

L0ke - Representative for Dr. Feriduni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Senior Member
On 4/24/2023 at 2:16 PM, Rafael Manelli said:

The trouble with fine hair is you need more density to look thick, and that means you need more grafts in the recipient but it also means you can afford to take fewer grafts from the donor before it looks thin there. And it’s more expensive in terms of money, and the grafts are more delicate.

Result here looks very natural though, and seems to have a good density. Is there a reason grafts were not prepared with a microscope?

Thank you 🙏 
In this case it was not necessary to microscopically prepare nor trim the grafts as these already were of excellent quality.
We were able to cherry-pick all the grafts -singles, doubles and triples- that we needed.
Finally, we always perform a stereo-microscopic quality control during surgery when the grafts are sorted.

L0ke - Representative for Dr. Feriduni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...