Jump to content
Baldy1974

Who is the best least expensive doctor in USA?

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jonnyalex said:

I think people seem to have this idea that if a HT clinic have been working with FUT for years and not so long with FUE, they are not as good at the latter. This belief is odd to me. FUE is simply an extraction method. One simply yields much more than the other. 

For example, H&W didn't perform FUE for as long as others but they are far superior to nearly anyone else at FUE. It is the same with Hattingen, only they don't aggressivly market themselves. So FUE results should be the same as FUT results if you talking about the same graft count. The key is in the ability and artistry of the surgeon and the tools they use. 

Interestingly, the doctor said I would have been a candidate for a 6500 graft FUT due to my scalp laxicity. Unfortunately I have already has 5500 FUE grafts taken so that is no longer an option. He did say that I could still have a 2500 FUT in the future and that I had 1500 FUE grafts left ( which surprised me ). He said this in regard to future hairloss however and this time I will only have a small FUE using fine hairs to make the hairline I got from ASMED appear more natural.

Here is a recent FUE result they posted. I don't think it gets much better than this. There is no dodgy lighting , ultra favourable hair characteristics or nonsense and that is why I chose them.

 

 

I would add to this that anyone considering a HT should cross those who don't use high powered microscopes OFF their list. It is an ESSENTIAL part of hair restoration surgery and no way in HELL should a clinic who doesn't use them EVER be recommeded. I learnt this the hard way. This first part of my surgery was removing all the doubles and triples placed in hairline by ASMED and Dr Keser ( ASMED didn't use microscopes in 2015 during my surgery). ASMED also placed hair facing the polar opposite direction which has to be removed.

 

 

Screenshot_20200312-194725_Photos.jpg

Wait...keser did you wrong too? If so that’s quite eye opening as he’s viewed as one of the best on this site and others for smaller cases

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, LonelyGraft said:

Wait...keser did you wrong too? If so that’s quite eye opening as he’s viewed as one of the best on this site and others for smaller cases

Which makes me question most of his results. He doesn't use microscopes and put multiples all over my hairline. I asked his translator,  who was suppose to keep in touch ( he never did ) and he said " I also have multiples in my hairline also , who do I blame ? God ? ". He has never had a hair transplant and thinks that multi hair grafts appear in your frontal like naturally. Need I say more ? 

It was clear to me that he was sick of answering this question from people and it is obviousy a common complaint with them.

Edited by jonnyalex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonnyalex said:

Which makes me question most of his results. He doesn't use microscopes and put multiples all over my hairline. I asked his translator,  who was suppose to keep in touch ( he never did ) and he said " I also have multiples in my hairline also , who do I blame ? God ? ". He has never had a hair transplant and thinks that multi hair grafts appear in your frontal like naturally. Need I say more ? 

It was clear to me that he was sick of answering this question from people concerning this and it is obviousy a common complaint with them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jonnyalex said:

Which makes me question most of his results. He doesn't use microscopes and put multiples all over my hairline. I asked his translator,  who was suppose to keep in touch ( he never did ) and he said " I also have multiples in my hairline also , who do I blame ? God ? ". He has never had a hair transplant and thinks that multi hair grafts appear in your frontal like naturally. Need I say more ? 

It was clear to me that he was sick of answering this question from people and it is obviousy a common complaint with them.

Jonny I feel for you, I know you’ve had a rough go. Did you have a thread of Kesers results? I think Dr. Muresanu is awesome, I spoke with him and he struck me as a very ethical doctor.

Not only that, but he mentioned swiss watches, and how the craftsmanship and attention to detail is why they’re so highly valued, and that’s how he looks at hair restoration. If you end up going to him, please share your story on here.


I do not provide medical advice, recommendations, all responses are my opinion.

My Hair Transplant Journey

Melvin- Associate Publisher and Forum Moderator for the Hair Transplant Network, the Coalition Hair Loss Learning Center, and the Hair Loss Q&A Blog.

Follow our Social Media Instagram @thehairtransplantnetwork FacebookPintrest, Linkedin and YouTube.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

Jonny I feel for you, I know you’ve had a rough go. Did you have a thread of Kesers results? I think Dr. Muresanu is awesome, I spoke with him and he struck me as a very ethical doctor.

Not only that, but he mentioned swiss watches, and how the craftsmanship and attention to detail is why they’re so highly valued, and that’s how he looks at hair restoration. If you end up going to him, please share your story on here.

Cool! When/why did you speak to him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/12/2020 at 12:40 PM, jonnyalex said:

I think people seem to have this idea that if a HT clinic have been working with FUT for years and not so long with FUE, they are not as good at the latter. This belief is odd to me. FUE is simply an extraction method. One simply yields much more than the other. 

For example, H&W didn't perform FUE for as long as others but they are far superior to nearly anyone else at FUE. It is the same with Hattingen, only they don't aggressivly market themselves. So FUE results should be the same as FUT results if you talking about the same graft count. The key is in the ability and artistry of the surgeon and the tools they use. 

It's an excellent point. I would argue Hasson is even better at FUE than FUT. And he was already amongst the best in the world at FUT, so that's not a small accomplishment.

I'm really sorry to hear about your experience with Keser -- he is normally so careful. I was trying to find where you posted your pics of his surgery but I seem to be missing them. Could you or someone here please direct me?

Edited by bismarck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×