Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In talking to different HT doctors I've always gotten the impression that 100% of transplanted grafts that stay secure survive. I say "impression" because I've never specifically asked one if all the grafts survive. I'd always heard that these grafts are genetically coded never to fall out, but what happens when they're moved, and maybe compromised to a certain extent? Again, I'm not talking about the grafts that fall out before they can be become permanent.

A friend who's an internal medicine doctor said he highly doubts 100% of these grafts survive, but she couldn't put an estimate on how many usually would survive. She said it would be too subjective, specific to the patient, and skill/experience of the doctors and their techs, etc. Of course she's not a HT doc. 

But it got me wondering, how many of your past HT grafts do you think have survived? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it’s anyones guess and mostly a BS thing in the industry. For any doctor to claim a X% survival rate, is BSing in my opinion. In order to get an actual count, they would need to somehow count each and every recipient site that they placed a graft in, and they simple don’t do that on follow up appointments. it would just frankly take too long. they do it all by eye

 

with that being said.. a good growth rate would VISUALLY be above 90%. but again it’s only by eye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completely...the other variable is the new FUE surgeon who is learning and refining their skills...in other words, there can potentially be a higher rate of transection for someone new at practicing FUE verses someone who is already at a high level of skill and performance.

The same would be true for newer techs who are learning the extraction process and/or microscopic dissection process.

And yes, there are occasions where these damaged grafts are still placed in the recipient sites and obviously do not survive because they are damaged.


Gillenator

Independent Patient Advocate

I am not a physician and not employed by any doctor/clinic. My opinions are not medical advice, but are my own views which you read at your own risk.

Supporting Physicians:  Dr. Robert True & Dr. Robert Dorin, New York, NY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate the input guys. I think there's a reluctance to discuss this beacuase, as you say hairlosspa, there's no reliable measure. I think, too, that it points to the importance of choosing experienced surgeons, and especially staff/techs who process the grafts to have a highlevel of competency. Agree with Gillenator that techs are a crucuial part of the process. The techs perform critical functions, and > 50%  of the operation it seems, so they better be good. The techs who've worked on me seem to have been very experienced, competent, and caring people people, but I've met other HT patients ( not on this site ) who had nightmare stories. 

Surviving grafts seems to depend on multiple factors, including a doctor's expertise, their techs' experience/competency, quality of donor follicles, and responsible aftercare by the patient. Since most everyone posting here had HTs under these circumctances the question of "What do you think your yield has been?" comes to mind. Based on my experience Drs Feller and Bloxham ( and their techs ) were the best HTs I've had by far. Unfortunately, I didn't discover them earlier, but better late than never. When I came to them I had significant scarring, and little donor area left. They did excellent work under difficult circumstances which is why I highly recommend anyone of similiar background/circumstances to them. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anybody will pin this question down.  For me it is how it looks at at least 9-12 months out and perhaps even a little longer than that.  I did not experience the shedding that is commonplace, perhaps because of my age (71), but at 8 months I am doing great.  I would be reluctant to believe any results promised for any cosmetic procedure, and testimonials can be very inaccurate.  I cannot even remember what I looked like back in 2011 before my first procedure.  I probably had one of the higher survival rates, but it would be impossible to put a figure on that.


"Imagination frames events unknown in wild fantastic shapes of hideous ruin, and what it fears, creates." Hannah More

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting topic and, I agree, difficult to answer.  Years ago, and even today, some doctors believe that grafts compete for blood supply at the time of surgery,  This is why most will leave a separation in between grafts to guarantee a successful procedure.  Is the take 100%?  (Nothing is 100%).  Close.  Once that first set of grafts is incorporated into the bloodstream, a patient can then consider a 2nd procedure.  But....

Within the last few years I have become aware of doctors that use advanced techniques, what I would call 3D, which allows for the "LOOK" of density with only one procedure.  The placement of the grafts is such that allows for the look of "full density." Mind you, this is graft number dependent as well as how the grafts are positioned.  I gather that the grafts are placed very closed together.  Is the take 100%  Doubt it.  High 90's?  I think so. 

Consider the hair dominance in the donor area and the type of procedure being used.  A reputable doctor will always take hair from the "safe zone."  FUE, if you've noticed, typically will take hair from "everywhere in the back," including the nape area.  If the patient is experiencing retrograde, these hairs eventually react the same way they would have if they had remained in the donor.  So for patients that complain down the road that they seem to be thinning a transplanted area, this would make sense. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Find a Pre-Screened Physician

  • Choose a proven physician
    Chosen by patients

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Newest Topics

  • Latest Posts

    • Before the operation, you and the doctor can determine the planting plan. It is possible to plant 3,000 hair follicles and possibly 5,000 hair follicles. But how do you know that so many hair follicles have been planted?  If you actually plant a few hundred hair follicles or even thousands, you probably don't know?  So the question is coming. Is there a way to prove how many hair follicles I planted last?  Especially the manual FUE
    • Folks, Apologies for loosing track of this thread as I got occupied with other things in life. I would post some pictures soon. Almost 11 months have passed since my surgery . Everything is looking fine. My hair have grown well and has completely changed my front look. Only little downside I faced is thin donor on the back but I am fine with that considering how much of a difference it has made on my front look.  Now I think that it is time that I should start focusing on mid scalp and crown area and would schedule personal consultation with doctor  to see what are my options (BHT....May be if possible??). Please share if some of you came across certain threads related to body hair transplantation, and if that is a reliable option.  
    • Looks good. Next two months, but even next month are transformative. My hairs are still thin, but I'm hopeful they thicken, I don't know why they wouldn't. The hairline looks good, and it passes as natural, even with the shorter and thinner HT hairs.  Most people won't spend long enough looking at your hair to notice anything. Enjoy yourself out there and don't worry about it. Even if anything was suspected, passing it off as a bad haircut or even "that's just how my hair grows" is sufficient. I would be in shock if enough people approached you with questions for you to even waste time thinking of responses. Your hair looks good.
    • Looking back through the thread, I think your results look promising. You have new growth where there was none before. The growth you have is like my growth, very thin and curly. I too need to have it thicken up. I looked at myself in mirror (I'll try posting update tomorrow), and my hair looks very similar to yours. I see the area Bhatti worked on has more density, along with the new hairline. The issue you and I have is that the new density doesn't look good against the contrast with existing density. I recommend going to get a haircut like you had at 3 months, and especially thinning out the non-DHT prone crown (the toilet seat shaped area). It is the part that gets the most dense. I think that the two steps I would take is waiting for the thickening (not sure how long your or my case will take), and finding a flattering haircut.  I also started to thin (maybe fin shed, maybe I'm getting balder!) in my top+crown. So I gently push hair sideways. I'll try to explain tomorrow on my post. There's no issue with styling your hair to fit you. I see a lot of posts that essentially want care-free hair. They want to look good all the time from all angles. I just wanted to not be bald! If it takes a few seconds to a few minutes to accomplish a look you like, it is what it is. Again, I recommend modifying styling options. Without a haircut, your HT hair is at a disadvantage to the native highly-dense hair. If you don't want to cut it all down to a 3 month point, I recommend using thinning shears and reducing the amount your non-recipient hair "falls" on itself. Any additional perceived density on surrounding hair reduces perceived density on recipient hair site.
    • Yes, we have two packages i.e. 1. Comprehensive Package and 2. Comprehensive and Exclusive Package. The above patient has availed the Comprehensive and Exclusive Package. 
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      35,374
    • Most Online
      1,187

    Newest Member
    kondofoni
    Joined
×