I agree this forum is a very useful and helpful resource. However I think it could be improved to help people even more. Ive seen a few patients who shared their experience of a HT with pictures and a write up and when their result was not as good as it should have been expected, ( and these Clinics are accepted and approved on this Network ) and other forum members were in agreement with this the write up of the patient comes to a sudden halt. Nobody knows what happened next? In all probability the patient would have made the Clinic that they recieved their HT from aware of the fact that the result was way below a good result. In a situation like this the forum and network who accepted and approved the Clinics in the first place should be smarter and wiser and insist that the approved Clinic who performed the HT give an explanation on why they think the HT of the patient on this forum recieved a poor outcome. Im not suggesting it should become a blame game to the Clinic, however It is the obvious way to end the thread so everybody can learn .afterall thats what we are here for.
What do you guys think???
6 months is no good tbh for a proper comparison as still in the growth phase... any pics a year post op or even better 18 months? so we can clearly see it was a successful transplant and compare how it looks compared to now.