FUE vs SMP for sparse areas.

[TheGman]

I just had a FUE HT two weeks ago. The hair greed is already manifesting itself.

 

I'm not sure I'd be ready to go through another operation soon.

 

A HT in a thinning area is quite a gamble and I like the idea to just drive to Milan for 5 hours and leave the next day with my results and no post-op restrictions.

 

I've seen some amazing SMP's into the crown for guys with longer hair here.

No shedding, no shockloss, it almost sounds too good to be true.

 

It would enable me to ditch the concealers.

 

It seems to me that HT's are mandatory to rebuild the hairline and create a bit of volume at the front, but if your hairloss is moderate at the back, a SMP is a better pick.

 

What do you guys reckon?