Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Many people have questions about the ARTAS procedure. The most common questions that we hear pertain to the donor area during the few first days and weeks post surgery. The patient featured below had a 2000 FU ARTAS procedure. The photos showcase the donor area: 1 DAY POST OP, 2 DAYS POST OP and 2 WEEKS POST OP. His crown shows improvement after only 2 weeks Post OP.

 

1day3_zpsm2zowcrq.jpg

 

1daypost_zpsczvglut2.jpg

 

1days5_zpsd7braoz9.jpg

 

2daypost5_zpssghc06jl.jpg

 

2days1_zpsct8p9nb0.jpg

 

 

RC2days4_zpshx9gdrwm.jpg

 

 

2weekspost1_zpshd7yhkvq.jpg

 

2weekspost4_zpsakrdayuf.jpg

 

2weekspost6_zpsx2f2bnt1.jpg

 

 

2weeks9_zpsmc0esnez.jpg


Employed by Dr. Bernard Arocha. Dr. Arocha is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting procedure. Looks very good after two weeks. Thanks for sharing the pictures. I'm sure the patient is very pleased.


I am an online representative for Carolina Hair Surgery & Dr. Mike Vories (Recommended on the Hair Transplant Network).

View John's before/after photos and videos:  http://www.MyFUEhairtransplant.com

You can email me at johncasper99@gmail.com

I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JohnCasper,

 

Thanks for your interest in our case. This was a nice case employing a .9mm punch with our ARTAS robot.

As usual the donor heals over a few days, but remarkably the early growth at two weeks has already largely filled in his crown hair loss. Happy Holidays to all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 Weeks ? that must be the fastest growth ever. I have not been impressed with the ARTAS results until now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr. Arocha, any thoughts on the unusual growth rate in the crown area? Interesting process, thanks for sharing.


I am an online representative for Carolina Hair Surgery & Dr. Mike Vories (Recommended on the Hair Transplant Network).

View John's before/after photos and videos:  http://www.MyFUEhairtransplant.com

You can email me at johncasper99@gmail.com

I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all due respect, this is nonsense. The hair is wet in the first photos where the FUE dots are shown. It's dry in the two week photos. The idea that a laser cap is responsible for crown growth at two weeks is an insult to our intelligence. The lower crown hair is also obviously combed up to cover the main part of the crown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello 911 Fan,

I certainly was not trying to insult your intelligence in any way. Yes, his hair is wet in the day of surgery photos and then it is dry in the 2 -week post photos. I was simply stating that the laser cap can help increase growth in the areas of the scalp that were not worked in. I know that this patient did decide to use the cap after his surgery, and it MAY have added some benefit to his hair growth. Thank you for taking the time to view and comment on our post.

 

-CeCe


Employed by Dr. Bernard Arocha. Dr. Arocha is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But Dr. Arocha said that the early growth has already filled in much of the crown. You are backtracking saying that it "may have added some benefit". You aren't agreeing with Dr. Arocha on what has happened. I think that you can take anyone with thinning hair, wet the hair, take a picture, dry the hair, take a picture, and you can get the same appearance on the same day. Even if there was growth it is impossible to say that there is a legitimate improvement with a presentation like this. I like the results coming out of your clinic but the marketing here is too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 911fan,

 

Turbo or RS? Carerra? I'm a fan too:) You are right, the presentation regarding the growth is not entirely transparent and the issue of the hair being wet in the before photos and dry in the after photos does not help matters. The point to take away from this series of photos however should have more to do with how effective ARTAS is becoming in matching the donor aesthetics of typical high quality manual punch extractions. Dr. Arocha performs both manual punch extraction and ARTAS extraction and he was very pleased to see how the latest updates to ARTAS have improved the usefulness of the robot. Smaller punches, smaller extractions and all with excellent graft integrity.


Online representative for Dr. Bernard Arocha

 

Learn more about Hair Transplants in Texas!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I appreciate your comments and I get your point. Thank you for acknowledging the issue and I do admit that the extractions look great and it does look like ARTAS is getting better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Find a Pre-Screened Physician

  • Choose a proven physician
    Chosen by patients

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Newest Topics

  • Latest Posts

    • I believe medical treatments like fin and minox work best in the crown areas so your experience matches the norm (meaning that such medications are not as effective on the front) The forelock is that area in the middle of the front of your hairline, so if you are a classic NW3 it sounds like your temples have just continued to recede While continuing any medications is always a decision to made by the patient, as long as you don't have any side effects then what is the harm? Especially given the fact your dermatologist has noticed more volume in areas and you've noticed some improvements as well.  If you planning any future surgery it's also strongly recommended by most doctors and clinics to be on fin for at least a year before any surgical date in order to prevent any shockloss to the surrounding native hairs, and also to continue taking it in order to maintain as much native hair as you have for the future. Otherwise you'll just be chasing any future hairloss with more surgeries.    
    • This the main reason I didn’t go with diep .. even though I already deposited the $1000 .. I rather risk losing the deposit than to have subpar results where he won’t fix it .. it’s always the customers fault if ur transplant don’t turn out well . Was the feeling I got when I was speaking the office manager ... hair transplants aren’t guaranteed . But if u don’t have good results , at least attempt to fix it .. who wants to spend $15,000- $20,000 n not get what they paid for.. I mean if ur results were B- quality . It’s still acceptable ,. But this is C- quality, how can u not attempt to fix things ..  they can’t ! Because they booked too far in advance , to fix the mistake they did on u will cost double the money .. the free repair + the $20,000 they would be losing to another potential patient that could be having surgery that day .. it’s just buisiness to the clinic , n another number .. but to us, it’s our savings n A permanent result that lasts forever ..  Good or bad .. clinics need to understand that ..   
    • What a great result, well done, Dr. I always find it interesting how wide 1500 FUE grafts look, compared to 1500 FUT. Not saying it's bad in any way, but FUT cases always make one forget how many grafts are actually being taken 😂
    • Hi everyone, I've been on Finasteride for about 2-3 years. In this time, I've had mixed results. As in, some areas got better, whilst others worsened slightly.  (I am on 0.5mg of fin, and 1.5mg of oral minox). I have a classic NW 3 pattern, and since taking it the peaks have continued to recede, albeit quite slowly - but the entire front (I think it's referred to as the forelock?) has remained intact.  My dermatologist has also noticed the overall volume/fullness of my hair to be better. I've also heard that finasteride is not as effective for the front portion of ones hair - is this true? And if so, should I continue with it whilst having mixed results? My thinking is, even if it isn't super effective on the front, maybe it will help keep the hair around the mid scalp and facilitate a transplant. Welcoming any thoughts
    • Eagerly following this one! If your results even come close to the current results you have with toppik it's going to be awesome Do you know how far the hairline was lowered (ballpark figure?)
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      35,345
    • Most Online
      1,187

    Newest Member
    MaximeL
    Joined
  • Top Members

×