Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Subtle and natural! Nice work.

"Doc" Blake Bloxham - formerly "Future_HT_Doc"

 

Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum

 

All opinions are my own and my advice does not constitute as medical advice. All medical questions and concerns should be addressed by a personal physician.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Was this done via ARTAS? Not too impressed if it was considering the high 90% yield claims..

 

At only 1400 grafts I don't see any reason to believe this wasn't perfect yield. My question is why was the session so small?

 

Age? Finances? New protocol?

I am an online representative for Dr. Raymond Konior who is an elite member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians.

View Dr. Konior's Website

View Spanker's Website

I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
At only 1400 grafts I don't see any reason to believe this wasn't perfect yield. My question is why was the session so small?

 

Age? Finances? New protocol?

 

I just find it hard to believe a surgeon would purposely implant at such a low density especially in the frontal third. Clearly it is far from dense. I dont believe this was a conscious choice. Also why are there areas with some growth but there are other areas right in close proximity with little to no growth. This points to a very inconsistent yield.

Edited by Mickey85
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...