Senior Member JON86 Posted November 3, 2015 Senior Member Share Posted November 3, 2015 Very well described post , thanks for sharing your experience , I have seen many good results of patients , having FUE treatment , and they were having quite a good result at Hair transplant in Indore.Once again your post is spam . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member Kiran0078 Posted November 24, 2015 Regular Member Share Posted November 24, 2015 Yeah, actually very nice set of information regarding advantages and disadvantages in FUE treatments. I have enjoyed the reading of this content Thank you ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godspeed Posted July 6, 2016 Share Posted July 6, 2016 For a normal haired human being how many grafts can be harvested from safe zone without going to unsafe zone for FUE method? Doctor 1 who is on the India (official email reply from him) List here is saying 2500 then we go to unsafe zone. Doctor 2 who is on the india list says 4000. Which is it?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aditijain Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I think FUE is best and safe than other ... Follicular Unit Extraction is a hair transplant procedure, in which the hair transplant physicians extract each hair follicle directly from the scalp. It is done randomly and it results in lower density of hair in the donor area which is not noticeable in most cases. 1. Pain Management In FUE, stitches are unnecessary and there is no existence of any linear scar, so healing time is short and there is almost non-existent post procedural discomfort. 2. Scarring There is no linear scarring as such in FUE but there are 1mm in diameter or less puncture marks which heal by themselves within 3 to 7 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Gasthoerer Posted April 16, 2017 Senior Member Share Posted April 16, 2017 (edited) From previous (non cosmetic) surgeries and other sport injuries which were not stitched up I got some scars. I was told that I am a "bad healer" and tend to have bigger (non flat so to say) scars. Does this make me to a poor HAT patient in general and/or particular to a poor FUE (or vice versa FUT) patient? Edited April 16, 2017 by Gasthoerer 400+ grafts in 2018 and 2900 grafts in 2020 via FUE with Feriduni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Dr. Mohammad Humayun Mohma Posted September 16, 2017 Senior Member Share Posted September 16, 2017 I am sorry if I am jumping in without going through the whole lot of the discussion on FUT vs FUE and most talking about benefits of FUE. let me share my thoughts about FUE and FUT. In fact if the person is less than or equal to type III and is in late 30's meaning the chances of progression to type V to VII in minimal. Then FUE alone is enough. As the donor area would support the harvest without actually thinning the donor area significantly. However, if the person is bound to reach stage V and more then the person will need both FUT and FUE to maximise the grafts without compromising the donor density less than the critical value. I presented this topic "Limitation of FUE in HT- are we removing more than desired". My theory is that there is a critical mass/no of grafts , if we reduce it beyond that number, we create a bigger problem then what we were trying to solve. I feel the donor density should not be reduced more than 35% of the donor density. The FUT reduce the width of the donor area and then minor readjustment because of stretch back of scar. With Age we get some reduction in hair numbers and also hair diameter . If we reduce the caliber of hair by 10 microns the overall impact can be as much as 36% as mentioned by Dr Cole. One has to remember that if we harvest more than 35% of the grafts from donor area in one surgery and then another 25%, we bring the patient donor area to 60% total reduction in thinness graph of baldness. Now if he looses 10% due to natural thinness with age he goes down to 30% and with reduction of caliber he becomes severely compromised donor density. So one has to understand the safe amount of harvest of FUE from donor area. This trend of doctors who are not getting trained in FUT due to non surgical training will be compelled to do FUE and then what you will see is what is happening in Turkey these days that non qualified people over harvesting the donor harvest. hope i am clear 1 --- I am a medical advisor to Lexington International and Hairmax. What ever I say is my personal opinion. Dr. Mohmand is recommended on the Hair Transplant Network Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Dr. Mohammad Humayun Mohma Posted September 16, 2017 Senior Member Share Posted September 16, 2017 i tried to post few pictures to make my point --- I am a medical advisor to Lexington International and Hairmax. What ever I say is my personal opinion. Dr. Mohmand is recommended on the Hair Transplant Network Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member Hairhope4ever Posted October 1, 2017 Regular Member Share Posted October 1, 2017 Really interesting, and quite frankly, judging by its length, a controversial one. Everyone has had both good and bad FUSS and FUE procedures. Ultimately it comes down to 2 things: If one can accept having a scar at the expense of a good result, and who the surgeon is that is conducting the procedure, for some are better at producing good FUE results, while others generate strong FUSS ones. About my hair loss journey: Happy Patient's Blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Sean Posted October 1, 2017 Senior Member Share Posted October 1, 2017 Sometimes, having a very minute scar may be better than having halos, low ass yields, thin looking hairlines with ridging and pitting etc. fUE Seems to work for some well and for some not so well. Starting to think its good for all hair types. Results can also be related to a doctors surgical protocol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member simrangoyal Posted January 10, 2019 Regular Member Share Posted January 10, 2019 Hair transplant is the latest technique. Hair transplant can be divided into two ways FUE, FUT. Follicular unit extraction is the advanced method that has less downtime and quick recovery period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aminnima Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 (edited) Thank you it was a great and comprehensive post. I searched many websites but none of them had this information. Edited May 15, 2019 by aminnima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mohit Singh Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Follicular unit extraction. this is a advance hair transplant techniques techniques but there are some pros and cons of FUE hair transplant surgery - Pros of FUE Surgery : Feel better quicker Wider harvesting options A more discreet scar Better for those more likely to scar Cons of FUE Surgery : Lesser graft quality It all takes that bit longer Subsequent FUE sessions may be problematic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member giegnosiganoe Posted April 24, 2020 Senior Member Share Posted April 24, 2020 Amazing post, this needs to be bumped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted February 19 Author Senior Member Share Posted February 19 On 4/25/2020 at 5:46 AM, giegnosiganoe said: Amazing post, this needs to be bumped. Thank you so much. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Melvin- Admin Posted February 20 Administrators Share Posted February 20 A lot of new users have no idea that FUE was once touted as an inferior technique. 10 years later, almost all surgeons perform FUE solely. It was a bit like surgeons refusing to accept follicular unit grafting because the grafts were too small. They thought mini-grafts were thicker, healthier and would survive better. We all know that wasn’t true now. I’m a paid admin for Hair Transplant Network. I do not receive any compensation from any clinic. My comments are not medical advice. Check out my final hair transplant and topical dutasteride journey: View my thread Topical dutasteride journey Melvin- Managing Publisher and Forum Moderator for the Hair Transplant Network, the Coalition Hair Loss Learning Center, and the Hair Loss Q&A Blog. Follow our Social Media: Facebook, Instagram, Linkedin, and YouTube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted February 26 Author Senior Member Share Posted February 26 On 2/21/2024 at 2:33 AM, Melvin- Admin said: A lot of new users have no idea that FUE was once touted as an inferior technique. 10 years later, almost all surgeons perform FUE solely. It was a bit like surgeons refusing to accept follicular unit grafting because the grafts were too small. They thought mini-grafts were thicker, healthier and would survive better. We all know that wasn’t true now. I agree, it has completely flipped now. I couldn't believe how hesitant some Doctor's were about it. Dr Lorzeno really was the one who showed that a clinic can restore high Norwoods using FUE exclusively. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now