Jump to content

Dr. Raymond Konior

Members
  • Content Count

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Dr. Raymond Konior last won the day on June 9

Dr. Raymond Konior had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

69 Excellent

1 Follower

About Dr. Raymond Konior

  • Rank
    Recommended Physician

Basic Information

  • Gender
    Male

Hair Transplant Clinic Information

  • Hair Transplant Surgeon
    Dr. Raymond Konior
  • Hair Transplant Network Recommendation Profile
  • Hair Transplant Clinic Name
    Raymond Konior, MD.
  • Primary Clinic Address
    1s280 Summit Avenue, Suite C-4
  • Country
    United States
  • State
    IL
  • City
    Oakbrook Terrace
  • Zip Code
    60181
  • Phone Number
    (630) 932-9690
  • Website
    http://www.premierehairdoc.com
  • Email Address
    drkonior@sbcglobal.net
  • Provides
    Follicular Unit Hair Transplantation (FUT)
    Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE)
    Eyebrow Transplantation
    Prescriptions for Propecia
    Free In-depth Consults

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Point 1: The primary advantage of using FUE over strip for a graft harvest is to allow a patient the option of wearing a very short hairstyle. This patient presented with two prior strip scars, one of which was exceptionally wide. His preexisting donor scars will always prevent him the option of wearing a very short hairstyle, thereby eliminating the decision to utilize FUE as the primary harvest method for his restoration. Point 2: A secondary reason one would choose FUE over strip for the graft harvest is relative donor site tightness, i.e. a very tight scalp will not allow for strip harvesting. This patient demonstrated sufficient looseness in an ideal location of the higher quality donor area, thereby making strip harvesting a viable option. Point 3: Planning a procedure has to take into consideration both long term and short term needs. This patient has an advanced pattern with a disproportionate imbalance between his limited donor supply and the high number graft needs of his large bald zone. A key issue here is what harvest strategy would allow this man the opportunity of yielding the largest number of grafts over his lifetime. An aggressive FUE harvest that would have yielded the same number of grafts as this combo approach could have resulted in a “one-and-done” session as the diffuse density reduction associated with FUE-only harvesting may actually have worsened his ability to camouflage the preexisting donor scars. Also, using an FUE-only approach would have forced the harvest into more unfavorable zones at risk for future thinning. Using a strip harvest for the primary harvest modality in this combo approach has not resulted in any new hair style requirements as the final scar heal from the session presented here was very good, i.e. his current hair style requirement is still based on the prior procedure scar issue. Additionally, the strip harvest concentrated graft isolation from the highest density and best quality central core of the donor area. In summary, the combo approach maximized a single-day harvest in terms of graft number yielded and overall graft quality, and it has allowed for another future session by preserving residual follicular-unit distribution in the donor area. A future session, however, may very well require an FUE-only approach if the limits of his donor area elasticity have been reached.
  2. This 39 year old patient presented with a history of two prior unsuccessful hair transplants in which a total of 3086 grafts had been placed in an attempt to restore his frontal male pattern baldness. He expressed concern that the procedures failed to produce any substantial regrowth or density gain. He was also bothered by a very wide scar that resulted from his second strip harvest procedure. The prior transplant zones demonstrated quite low density in consideration of the prior 3086 grafts that had been performed. His donor area revealed a very wide scar extending from the occipital region to the right temple donor region. Overall his donor area was deemed compromised because of the past harvests and the resulting wide scar. The surgical plan devised included another strip harvest in the remaining higher density, core donor region, and a secondary FUE harvest for recruiting grafts from the nape region. This combination approach was used to maximize the graft harvest while minimizing further cosmetic handicap in the donor region. The strip harvest yielded 2829 grafts and the FUE harvest yielded 541 grafts, resulting in a total of 3370 grafts for the restoration. Strip grafts were primarily distributed in the frontal and midscalp regions, while the finer nape hairs were used to create a transitional thinning appearance from the midscalp into the crown. Presented here are nine month postoperative results. Also presented are various photos of immediate graft placement and the harvest zone. Preop Front Preop Top 1 Preop Top 2 Preop Top 3 Preop Left Preop Right Postop Front Postop Top 1 Postop Top 2 Postop Top 3 Postop Left 1 Postop Left 2 Postop Right Planned Graft Zones Immediate Postop Strip Graft Placement View 1 Immediate Postop Strip Graft Placement View 2 Immediate Postop FUE Graft Placement Immediate Postop Combo Graft Placement Immediate Postop FUE Donor Site Appearance FUE Donor Site 24 Hours After Surgery
  3. There is no single best source for all patients. Hair color and texture matches are important, and it is not uncommon for these characteristics to vary between the donor and recipient sites. Beard hair is a good option when the scalp shows signs of donor depletion and the physical characteristics of the two zones are relatively favorable. Hair for hair, beard is a good camouflage agent because of its high caliber. Each patient needs to be evaluated on an individual basis to determine what is best for him or her.
  4. This 36 your old patient requested density enhancement in his centralized frontal and midscalp thinning zones. A total of 1918 grafts were used to boost density in his priority zones. Presented are sixteen month postop photos. Preop Front Preop Right Preop Left Preop Top Postop Front Postop Top Postop Right Postop Right Tilt View Postop Right Comb-back View Postop Left Postop Left Tilt View Postop Left Comb-back View Density Inspection Right-of-Center Density Inspection Center Density Inspection Left-of-Center Immediate Postop Graft Placement 4-Day Postop Back Donor Area 4-Day Postop Side Donor Area
  5. This 38 year old patient requested density enhancement in his thinning frontal and midscalp regions. His exam revealed a diffuse thinning pattern throughout the male pattern zone. The donor area showed low caliber hair and evidence of retrograde alopecia. He underwent a 3088 graft restoration of the frontal and midscalp regions. Presented are fourteen month postop results. These include part views in the graft zones that demonstrate his density enhancement. Preop Front Preop Top Preop Right Preop Left Postop Front 1 Postop Front 2 Postop Top Postop Right 1 Postop Right 2 Postop Right 3 Postop Left 1 Postop Left 2 Density Inspection Center Density Inspection Front Density Inspection Right Density Inspection Left Postop Donor Area Immediate Postop Graft Placement
  6. Why are you dying the hair? It's going to be clipped with a zero guard. A responsible surgeon will dye it to the extent that extraction quality will be maximized.
  7. The patient should not be worrying about dying the hair if the plan is for a buzz-cut FUE harvest. Dying long hair that will be clipped is pointless as the hair will continue to grow after it is dyed. If the procedure is a few days after the dye, all that will be left for the surgeon to see will be a white stubble. Also, even professional dyes have a hard time getting to the base of the hair shaft. The surgical team should dye the white stubble after buzzing and before harvesting. This easily colors the stubble to show hair direction and angle, thereby making extraction as easy as with dark hair. The attached file shows snow-white hair which was dyed immediately prior to the harvest. The hair shafts are quite easy to see.
  8. What is my opinion on clinics that utilize technicians for extracting grafts? Hmm… Answer these three questions: 1) Would you allow a tech to remove a brain aneurysm on your mother? 2) Would you allow a tech to perform coronary artery bypass on your father? 3) Would you allow a tech to remove a testicular cancer on you? If the answer is “yes” to any of these questions, you should do nicely in a tech-driven hair restoration facility. If, on the other hand, you answered “no” to all questions, then ask yourself why you would allow a technician to perform a surgical procedure on your scalp. Also, if you answered “no” to all questions, and you decide to use a facility that uses technicians for graft extraction – without direct supervision by the operating doctor – ask your doctor why he or she is not performing the procedure, but rather uses the service of a technician to perform what I deem to be a surgical procedure. Questions I would direct to the physician if he or she uses technicians for graft extraction without direct doctor supervision: 1) Do you use a technician because you have poor eyesight? 2) Do you use a technician because you have a tremor? 3) Do you use a technician because you will be in another room maximizing your profit for the day? 4) Do you use a technician because you don’t believe patient care and supervision is important? 5) Do you use a technician because you are lazy and prefer to surf the web or check your stock portfolio? 6) Do you use a technician because you lack surgical skills and believe the technician is capable of delivering a better quality graft than you would be capable of delivering? 7) Do you believe harvesting grafts is a “simple” component of the surgical procedure or that harvesting grafts is “no big deal” such that it can readily be delegated to a technician? The bottom line is that I believe hair restoration is a surgical procedure that should be performed by a doctor. It is not a mundane and simplistic task that is capable of being delegated to the technician level. Face it, most technicians have little to no formal education, i.e. they receive “on the job” training. Who is training them and who is supervising them? We in this practice respect the doctor-patient relationship and feel that the patient is entitled to the doctor’s presence in the operating room from beginning to end.
  9. The mostly useless topic of manual versus motorized should be relegated to the trash heap. It may have held relevance at some point in time, but it means little today. Patients should also be leery of dogmatic statements made about how an individual conducts his or her practice as the only person who can provide definitive detail as to what is done and how it’s done is the surgeon himself. The fact is that I use multiple devices for extracting grafts, with the device of choice depending on the situation at hand. There are days when a motorized technique is best and days when a manual technique is best. There are days when a straight-wall trephine is best and days when a flared-wall trephine is best. There are days when a straight-edge trephine is best and days when a serrated-edge trephine is best. This argument reminds me of guys arguing which is better, a straight-edge screwdriver or a Phillips screwdriver. Of course the answer is that it depends on the situation at hand. Also remember, there are some talented surgeons who can use every technology effectively and some who, despite having the best of the best instruments, can’t extract quality grafts on a consistent basis. When it’s all said and done, it’s not the instrument that matters as much as the surgeon choosing the instrument to use for the situation at hand. If you place the world’s finest and most expensive Steinway piano in front of most people, very few would be able to generate a beautiful song. On the other hand, place one of the world’s top five pianists in front of a Walmart special keyboard and you will probably hear some darn good tunes.
  10. My experience shows 300 grafts to be an average amount needed for average strip scars in need of camouflage. There are definitely cases needing fewer and some needing more, but this is a good estimate for most. It is interesting and encouraging that most patients burdened with visible scars can eventually opt for fairly short hair styles if enough grafts are used. I find two staged sessions are needed for most larger scars when one wants to go with the shorter hair styles.
  11. This 34 year old patient presented with a history of three prior hair restoration procedures that were performed by three different surgeons. He was unhappy with the lack of density and patchy appearance in the prior transplant zones. The patient also expressed concern about the visibility of his strip harvest scar. His examination revealed very low frontal and midscalp density which was of concern in light of him having undergone three prior procedures. Restoration of the density deficient frontal and midscalp regions, as well as the donor strip scar, was performed using a total of 1940 grafts that were obtained using an FUE harvest. The scar was treated with 300 grafts and the frontal/midscalp regions were managed with 1640 grafts. Presented here are preop and postop pics which demonstrate the final frontal/midscalp density and donor scar camouflage that was accomplished. Preop Front Preop Right Donor Preop Center Donor Preop Left Donor Postop Front Postop Top View 1 Postop Top View 2 Postop Top View 3 Postop Top View 4 Postop Right View 1 Postop Left View 1 Postop Right View 2 Postop Left View 2 Postop Right View 3 Postop Left View 3 Postop Center Donor Postop Right Donor Postop Left Donor Graft Placement Zone - 5 Days Postop Donor Scar Graft Placement - 5 Days Postop
  12. This 39 year old male requested frontal hairline restoration. His exam revealed an isolated frontal hairline recession with excellent hair characteristics elsewhere. An FUE harvest was recommended to accommodate his desire to sport different hairstyles which included short hair. A total of 945 grafts were used to enhance density and shape at the frontal hairline. Presented here are one year postop pics. Immediate graft placement pics, one-day and one-week postop pics and density inspection views of the graft zone are included. Preop Front: Preop Tilted View: Preop Right Preop Left Postop Front 1 Postop Front 2 Postop Front 3 Postop Front Comb-back Postop Left 1 Postop Left 2 Postop Left Comb-back Postop Right Postop Right Close-up Intraop Planned Graft Zone Immediate Intraop Graft Placement One Day Postop Graft Zone One Week Postop Graft Zone Donor Site Day of Surgery Donor Site One Day Postop Donor Site One Week Postop Density Inspection Center Density Inspection Left
  13. This 29 year old patient requested reinforcement of his frontal hairline. A total of 2204 grafts were transplanted using a non-shave, stick-and-place approach. Presented here is his eighteen month postop result.
  14. This 48 year old patient presented eight year earlier hoping to boost density throughout his thinning frontal and midscalp regions. His history was significant for progressive thinning over the previous decade. He began using oral finasteride and experienced decent stabilization, but wanted to strengthen density in the remaining weak zones. A total of 2550 grafts were transplanted throughout the frontal and midscalp zones with distribution being prioritized based on the relative degree of thinning in the various zones. Presented are eight year follow-up photos, including part views, which show the density gains achieved. The value of ongoing finasteride treatment for maintaining density in the preexisting, genetically-susceptible follicle population is implied from the long term density gain that has been realized.
×