Grace,
If you truly mean to help, then posting pics of the work of the docs you consider to be as good as the coalition docs would be a start.
Keep in mind, consistent performance/results is the key, so a few or even a dozen results is no way indicative of the results one could expect from any particular "good" doc, although it is certainly a good way to weed out the bad ones pretty quickly.
I have had 2 procedures with 2 different docs. The first was a non-coalition doc who spewed all sorts of credentials,awards, etc. & did NOT do as good a job as I anticipated. These "credentials", awards, etc. were not from the folks who had procedures done.
My second procedure was done by a coalition doc. It has only been 4 months since my procedure, so the jury is still out, although the early growth seems to be good & I am expecting to have good results based upon what I've seen so far & based upon his past results. His credentials I researched online in a number of different patient & HT forums, similar to this one.
Bottom line....a HT is sort of like any product....you know what to expect from a coalition doc based upon previous performances/word of mouth;however,if the doc in question is an "unknown" quantity or the word of mouth of his place of business has been poor, then it's a crap shoot. Since the donor supply is limited, anybody taking a risk with an unknown doc after doing the research is being foolish.
I'm looking forward to seeing the work of the Bosley docs that you mentioned.