Jump to content

Observatory40

Regular Member
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Observatory40's Achievements

Real Hair Club Member

Real Hair Club Member (2/8)

9

Reputation

  1. None of the surgeons I'm looking into provide it for free. I'm willing to take on the additional expense of including it in my procedure if it actually has a noticeable benefit, but it seems like the jury is largely still out on how effective it is.
  2. Question for everyone whom elected to have a one-time treatment of PRP at time of their hair transplant: Was it worth the cost? Do you believe it had any positive healing effect on your recipient and donor areas? Some references say have it done at the time of transplant. Some say you should wait 10 days *after transplant* with a follow up every few months thereafter. Then on the other side of the table, some say it should be avoided all together and does more harm than good like this article from Feller and Bloxham: https://fellermedical.com/hair-transplants-vs-prp/. Thoughts everyone? Would love to hear some personal experiences with one-time use PRP treatment at time of hair transplant. Thanks.
  3. Looks great for 5.5 months! Zarev is a wizard. For high NW's he is the best, imo.
  4. Hello all! There must be a thread written about this topic somewhere, but I've attempted to search this forum and could not locate one. For an FUE procedure, what is the highest amount of graphs that would be safe to perform in single daily session (when the help of technicians are involved)? At what number of graphs should the procedure be extended over the course of two days to help minimize risk of potential complications? Would love to gather opinions from the community here on the pro's and con's of a single session vs. a two day sessions. Especially helpful for the community members here who are "wobbler" cases in the 3,600 graph range. I've seen some clinics with very low daily graph limits for FUE while others are seemingly comfortable going into the 4K range. Thoughts?
  5. Congratulations on the growth! Pekiner is putting out some good results lately. Donor looks quite impressive on many of the cases I've seen.
  6. Agreed. Looking on point! I think this will turn out to be a great result.
  7. I agree, BaldV. Based on my observations from reviewing many results on here from Ahmad, his hairlines are routinely high and conservative. He only performs 1-day sessions while handling most of the procedure himself, so he is limited by a specific graph count. I have yet to see a single case of consecutive-day sessions by Ahmad with 3,000+ graphs. As one can see for themselves on HRN and elsewhere, the vast majority of his patient cases are in the range of 1800-2500 graphs. It's common knowledge that it's easier to achieve appealing results if the hairline is placed high and a conservative design because you can dense pack all those graphs into a smaller area. If you were to spread that same amount of graphs over a larger area, the results would likely suffer poor density issues. Not to discredit the fact that a good dense-packed HT still requires skill. It certainly does. However, it is reasonable to ponder the question with any surgeon who operates in such a fashion (flat-rate procedure fee w/ single day session only, limited graph availability): Are they suggesting a design that is truly in the best interests of you as a patient, or their own, due to their limitations as a surgeon? It's important factor to consider. I certainly have my opinion from cases I've seen of Munib Ahmad, but I will keep it to myself.
  8. Looks great! Temple points or not, this is already a homerun 10/10 result. Congrats, man!
  9. I gotta be honest. I agree with your concerns. Hairline design looks off, IMO. Have you spoken with Bisanga regarding this issue?
  10. Amazing work! This result looks great. I wish there was more Heitmann patient journeys available across the forums. I've only been able to locate 2 or 3. Unfortunately, his website is very outdated with no high resolution photos or video. No pictures of his patients' donor areas either.
  11. Sorry to see this kind of result. That work in the corner is rough.... Has the clinic offered you a refund so you can get it fixed elsewhere or at minimum, a repair?
×
×
  • Create New...