I agree, BaldV. Based on my observations from reviewing many results on here from Ahmad, his hairlines are routinely high and conservative. He only performs 1-day sessions while handling most of the procedure himself, so he is limited by a specific graph count. I have yet to see a single case of consecutive-day sessions by Ahmad with 3,000+ graphs. As one can see for themselves on HRN and elsewhere, the vast majority of his patient cases are in the range of 1800-2500 graphs. It's common knowledge that it's easier to achieve appealing results if the hairline is placed high and a conservative design because you can dense pack all those graphs into a smaller area. If you were to spread that same amount of graphs over a larger area, the results would likely suffer poor density issues. Not to discredit the fact that a good dense-packed HT still requires skill. It certainly does. However, it is reasonable to ponder the question with any surgeon who operates in such a fashion (flat-rate procedure fee w/ single day session only, limited graph availability): Are they suggesting a design that is truly in the best interests of you as a patient, or their own, due to their limitations as a surgeon? It's important factor to consider. I certainly have my opinion from cases I've seen of Munib Ahmad, but I will keep it to myself.