Jump to content

washingtondc

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

washingtondc's Achievements

New Real Hair Club Member

New Real Hair Club Member (1/8)

6

Reputation

  1. Thanks for finding this; it definitely seems to be his opinion that it wouldn't damage at least a transplanted existing follicle (which you would hope would also extend to native follicles). That's a pleasantly surprising answer honestly if that's really the case. Maybe the depth of the incisions doesn't go far enough to actually damage follicles that are already there? And then even if there's a new follicle above or overlapping, the existing one just kind of works the hair around or something? I would love to see him or some other surgeon actually test and prove this.
  2. Thanks a bunch for posting. Looks great. Comparing my most recent frontal photo to yours, it looks like he got them in there at more regular intervals and at a higher density on you; this is what I was hoping mine would look like haha. The edge of your hairline looks like it will wind up so natural with that full density to the edge and then those little extended tips. Mine doesn't have that at all, it just kind of... awkwardly gets patchy. Almost looks like the work of two entirely different surgeons. I suspect I'm gonna be pretty jealous in a year; this looks phenomenal. Will be good to be on similar timelines for growth. Thanks a bunch again for posting.
  3. Right, thanks. The point to the question was to try to find out whether, during a hair transplant, follicles that are resting in the recipient area are destroyed by the incisions/grafts that are implanted, or if they're not affected, or if maybe surgeons can still tell where they are and avoid them. People with telogen effluvium, for example, have a massive number of hairs (far above the normal percentage) pushed into the exogen phase. These hairs will restart their anagen cycle and grow back, but my question is whether most of the follicles that are in the exogen phase are destroyed in the recipient zone during a transplant. Surgeons put hair where there isn't hair; do the exogen follicles with no hair present to mark them get destroyed in the process of implantation of a graft, and to what degree?
  4. Take a square inch of scalp that's affected to a degree by MPB. It has some existing non-miniaturized hair and some miniaturized hair. It also has some hair that's in the 2-5 month-long exogen phase, where the visible hair has shed out but a new hair is starting growth under the skin in the follicle. If you get a hair transplant, are all of the follicles in the recipient zone that are still viable but don't have a hair currently visible destroyed by the incisions/grafts, or do some survive? Depends on the density maybe?
  5. Was thinking about this a bit more and got a little confused reconciling it with what I thought I knew. Just for the sake of learning and discussion: I thought the conventional wisdom with HT was that you were supposed to fill the hairline as densely as possible (as that's the front and what everyone sees) and then you can decrease in density as you move back, as further back becomes less and less visible. What you're describing here is the inverse of that, the hairline being more sparse and then a denser "wall of hair" starting behind it. That's why we see people like Hasson and Wong really dense-packing the hairline, making that the densest part of the scalp, and then lesser farther back. Is that not kind of the opposite of what we're describing here, with the front few centimeters being less dense than the hair directly behind it? Thanks, just always trying to understand/learn and it seems I may be misunderstanding something.
  6. Thanks; that's helpful. Comparing it to pictures from Day 1/2 I don't see any missing grafts, but entirely possible. My nature is to be kind of analytical/scientific so I always wind up scrutinizing this sort of thing. I know from being on here that it's truly a waiting game and I'm going to have to change a bit for this process and be less focused. I wanted to make sure it didn't look like a big issue to any/all of you who have been seeing this process for years, because I'm still quite new compared to a lot of the veterans on this site. Thanks for your perspective.
  7. So I'm now 6 days post-op, and starting to take a closer look at the actual grafts and placement and density, and going through the traditional rite of passage of being slightly apprehensive. Hopefully I'm way off here. Initial picture for frame of reference: Then a zoomed in crop: Then a zoomed in comparison where I've highlighted 8 of my thinned out existing hairs in green and 8 of what I can see to be transplanted hairs in blue: Obviously, the density of my thinned existing hair appears far greater than what it looks like the density of the transplant zone is? Like, unless there are grafts that have been transplanted that have literally 0 stubble sticking through (none of my grafts have fallen out or started shedding yet), this is a pretty big difference? Further, since a decent number of grafts have been transplanted into that area where I have existing hair now (pending whatever is permanently shocked out) the density there is only going to increase, just furthering the disparity? Hopefully I'm way off or missing something here; I'm not sure how I'm not going to wind up with a distinct and unnatural looking line a couple centimeters wide at the edge of my forehead... I'm well aware that a transplant will never achieve initial/natural density; but the entire reason I did a transplant was because my existing hairline had thinned far below natural density (far beyond 50% thinner) already, so the density there is already extremely thinned out/see-through. I can't really imagine what this frontal region is going to look like unless I'm misunderstanding something; can anyone here explain or have you seen this turn out alright? Thanks very much. I doubt I'm the first to scrutinize the difference in density, but it just seems like a large difference to me.
  8. So I'm now 5 days post-op. I still haven't been able to fully submerge the donor area to massage it because I've been advised to let the open wound heal first, but there was hardly any blood on my bandage this morning, so I think I may give it a try today. I have this gross dried blood above where the gap is that kind of accumulated/coagulated during the first day or two; I've been chipping away at it but I'm hoping I'll be able to mostly get rid of it today, and also that submerging the area doesn't mess with the scab that's likely forming in the gap. Recipient pictures are from yesterday, so technically Day 4, everything look normal and good with density/etc up front?
  9. Suture issue aside, how do the grafts and transplant look to everyone? Density okay? Every time I see intraoperative photos from Wesley I was always impressed because it seemed like somehow a lot of the grafts never even had the initial red ring around them; they're just tiny bristles that blend into the skin. So there are actually a lot more hairs there than there are red spots, which kind of seems to be different from the impression I get of most post-op photos.
  10. Okay, thanks; that's reassuring. I hope that's the case. This would all be super easy if it had all just sutured up normally, this just makes it annoying/complicated because I did long-hair so the blood all gets into it and dries and just further complicates cleaning/sleeping/etc. Hopefully the bleeding will stop in a day or two and it will all be smooth sailing from there. Appreciate the input.
  11. Sure, here's a picture of the portion that isn't quite sealed. (Warning for the squeamish). The rest of it is sutured together normally, it's just this part that looks like this and the rest is tightly connected.
  12. Adding pictures from 24 hours post-op. I have to wear the headband bandage because the back of my head is still bleeding. So still really curious about this suture laxity issue. Did I really spend months researching this, narrow things down to a premier hair surgeon in the country that I travelled hours to get to, take things pretty conservatively and still run into an issue that no one on this board has ever seen before? That would definitely be my luck this year so far. The suture gap tightness is getting quite annoying, I have to be extremely careful when I eat because if I open my jaw too much, it moves/tightens the skin on the scalp, and it seems to pull the gap apart some and cause more bleeding. I've taken to blending my meals in a Cuisinart before eating to try to avoid chewing as much as possible, but I still have to move my jaw some. I can post a picture of the gap if people aren't too squeamish, it's basically just like a wider part of the suture line where there's space between the edges and a little blood. Has no one run into this before?
  13. So, we unfortunately ran into a little bit of a minor snafu with my procedure. I guess my scalp laxity was tighter in the middle portion of my donor than it was on the sides. So Dr. Wesley reached the middle suturing the strip back up, and the middle portion didn't quite reach back together in the usual way. So he had to use different sutures in that portion and there's a bit of a small gap that he says will likely result in a dime-sized bald spot/potential scar; he's offered to FUE hairs into that region free of charge in 6 months or so. A little disappointing to know I likely won't wind up with the pencil-thin scar you're supposed to in that region but I pretty much always have long enough hair (and intend to have long enough hair) that it hopefully won't be noticable, but at least he's offered to graft into that area to somewhat repair it. I also have to wear a heandband-shape bandage to allow that area to heal for a few extra days, and may need to have the sutures taken out in a two-step process rather than all on the same day. Has anyone here ran into this issue in with an FUT where the middle scalp laxity doesn't allow for normal suturing?
  14. I've been using this forum a ton over the past months to plan out who would work best as a surgeon for my procedure. I wanted to pay it forward and provide updates with my experience with Dr. Wesley, especially because (while he seems to be highly regarded) there don't seem to be a ton of member-created reviews, progress pictures, patient experiences, etc. for him. So I figured I'd add mine. I'm a 31 year old male who first started noticing my hair thinning probably just about a decade ago. I went on finasteride in 2012, and have been using it on and off since (no real sides, I just did a bad job meeting with my primary care physician to re-up my prescription when it ran out, and as a result, had a few periods of maybe 9 months or so when I wasn't on it. I was off it for a decent amount of 2020, but just got back on again just over two months ago in May '21. I' also used topical minoxidil and dermapen some in the past year or two, but wasn't terribly consistent with it (probably not enough or for long enough to see results). I'm now approximately a NW 3. I had an extremely stressful psychological event happen in mid March of this year, and a month or so after, I started noticing an increased amount of hair shedding out in showers. I have very long hair for a guy (pictures below) so the shedding was very obvious, and that's what caused me to get back on Fin asap. Since then (especially since June) my hair has been shedding at an alarming rate (maybe 200 hairs per day), and seems to be shedding from the back and sides of the head rather than just the area affected by MPB. This has led me to believe that I may have telogen effluvium as well. Unfortunately I had already scheduled and put down a $5000 deposit with Dr. Wesley before I realized this was likely the case, but I discussed things with him and he seems assured that if I have TE, it won't result in a worse transplant result. I did a consult with another surgeon (located in Ft. Lauderdale, FL) previously before finding this forum, but once I saw more reviews and the surgeons that have been vetted by this community, I decided Wesley was likely my man. The main factors in this decision were his excellent reputation on this board, the many, many quality and natural looking results he posts regularly, and (importantly) the fact that he was taught to do hair transplants without shaving the recipient area. I like my hair long; it took me two and half years to get it to this length, so having to shave it would likely be a deal-breaker. I went FUT because I could just shave and remove the strip from the back and the long hair back there will hide the sutures/scar. I did an in-person consult with Dr. Wesley about a month ago and came away impressed; he seems to know his stuff and is very friendly. I arrived at 10:30 AM this morning having spent the night in NYC the night before (I'm from out of town). When I arrived, we did a brief recap of the plan for the hairline that we had laid out during the initial consult, and made a few very minor tweaks. I was given Valium and Vicodin, changed into scrub-type gear, and then was off to the races. My donor strip was shaved first and then removed, as well as the implantation slits created, which took a few hours. The combination of Valium and Vicodin made me extremely drowsy, and so I was in and out of consciousness for the entirety of the procedure, but I felt just about 0 pain (just the initial pin prick feelings to numb the scalp). When I awoke, I took a bathroom break and then the technicians began implanting the grafts. This took a few hours again, and I again dozed for much of the procedure. Approximately 2200 grafts were implanted; I'm hoping to get the exact number and follicle breakdown tomorrow. When they were finished, I took a quick few immediate post-op photos, and then my head was wrapped in a bandage. I'll be returning tomorrow morning to have the hair areas cleaned and to receive final post-op instructions. Below are a variety of photos I've taken over the last 3 months to try to get a good sense for the current state of my hair. Some of them are in harsh lighting with the hair clean, some are in complementary lighting with the hair dirty, some wet in harsh lighting, etc. I also tried to include as many angles as I could so I have as many reference points as possible to compare to in the future. I'm definitely going to be continuing on Fin (more rigorously now) and will likely also add oral Minoxidil into my stack as well, assuming it doesn't produce side effects as I introduce it gradually. Really worried about shock loss of the pre-existing hair and hope that's kept to an absolute minimum, because if you lose a 2-inch hair to shock loss, it's not that big a deal; it will regrow and be the same length in just a few months. Losing hair that's my length is way more of a gut punch because it will literally take 2 years or so for it to regain that length, so for that reason I'm hoping to be fortunate and only experience a little. Thanks to everyone who's shared so many experiences and so much information on this forum; it really helped me to make a decision. I'll be updating this thread fairly regularly (and hopefully wont be obsessively checking myself every day and/or freaking out when I hit the ugly duckling phase).
×
×
  • Create New...