Jump to content

JeremyJamesLevy

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JeremyJamesLevy

  1. Building on this, @Melvin- Moderatorcoukd you comment on the differences between the Big 3 & 5 please? Thanks!
  2. I saw this from a company offering Regenera which sounds logical but wondered if it was actually true: Advantages of skin biopsy versus adipose derived stem cells: Skin tissue of the scalp is far more specific than adipose tissue, due to having the same embryological origin as the affected region of the hair loss. The science behind the regenerative capabilities is of powerful protein progenitor cells. These important cells inclosed within the micrograft, and provide a solution that is a powerful site-regulated drugstore that serves as a modulatory agent. By injecting these micrografts into the affected areas of hair loss, these cells are able to perceive the micro environment that surrounds them. To obtain the same amount of progenitor you need at least 10ml of fat tissue, whereas, with a skin biopsy micrograft, you only need three small dermatological punches of 2 mm to achieve the same quantity. Finally, skin biopsies of far less invasive than lipo with much less bruising.
  3. Hi, I'm early stage hair loss, 32 y/o taking finasteride for just over a year as well as 3 PRP treatments. This appears to have stabilised the hairline & I'm monitoring this with the hope of a frontal restoration. I've been hearing a lot of noise and optimism about exosomes and starting looking into treatments in the UK. I've come across two different options two options for Exosomes/Stem Cell therapy: Regenera Activa - which involves taking a sample of hair from the back that is unaffected by hair loss Kerastem - small liposuction to extract adipose tissue I wondered if people have any experience or opinions on the different approaches? Thanks, Jeremy
×
×
  • Create New...