Jump to content

Tranquility

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Tranquility's Achievements

New Real Hair Club Member

New Real Hair Club Member (1/8)

0

Reputation

  1. I've been considering tricopigmentation at BeautyMedical in Italy as they seem to produce really good results, but I have some doubts about the procedure that hopefully someone can address. Background: I have very fair skin with (what used to be) dark, dense hair, and my crown is completely bald, with the front headed that way as well. I shave daily, but my "shadow" formed by the remaining hair remains very pronounced even after a close shave. I wonder how much sense the procedure would make for someone like me without looking fake. Many permanent SMPs seem very fake/shiny to me and I'd like to avoid that. Tricopigmentation results in studio photos look really good. But how well does the pigment blend in with the remaining natural follicles in different lighting conditions - is the look uniform at all times? In darker lighting conditions, the contrast between bald and non-bald skin areas is much more pronounced than in bright (e.g. daylight) conditions. I fear that tricopigmentation - having a constant color - would only blend in naturally for maybe several hours after a shave. I shave in the morning, but by the evening, my remaining hair is already noticeably darker than it was immediately after a shave: it gets "grainier" and starts to reflect light differently. Are there any photos/videos demonstrating how the trico looks e.g. 12 or 24 hours after a shave? What does SMP/trico on a totally bald area feel like when you touch it? Can you tell the difference between pigmented bald areas and naturally shaved follicles by touch alone? I was able to find these videos which mostly look good, but they don't really answer these questions. I'd be grateful for any feedback.
×
×
  • Create New...