Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About hair4tomo

  • Rank
    Junior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Nah it's fine. I'll just go for a more expensive one. I was just wondering about the success rate for the average one, but if you don't know, that's fine, no worries.
  2. Thanks for your feedback both. What are the odds (as a percentage) for permanently losing significant (noticeable) existing thinning hair under an 'average' surgeon, versus a top 20% surgeon versus a top 5% surgeon?
  3. Say if I went with an average or below average hair transplant surgeon using the FUE technique, and I had hair from the back of my head transplanted to my thinning temples. Now, I already have existing hair around my temples, but it's quite thin, so I'd like some more hair there. What are the chances that transplanting hair to that region will damage the EXISTING hairs that were already there? I'm thinking of going for a somewhat cheaper surgeon, but I'm worried I'll lose existing hair in my temples. Is there any chance of that? Or is the 'danger' simply only that a good percentage of the newly transplanted hairs may not themselves succeed.
  4. I'm approximately at stage 3 on this chart, and I want to improve matters: https://i.imgur.com/NX8SJ7z.png There seem relatively few reviews of Dr Camilo Diaz compared to many, so I was wondering if any of you could share experiences of this particular surgeon. He seems pretty well qualified being an expert in dermatology and is listed at the gmc-uk . org site (GMC Registration Number: 4684985), so I know he's legit. However, I am curious to see results of his work, including immediately post surgery, and after twelve months or so.