Jump to content

hairman22

Senior Member
  • Posts

    623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by hairman22

  1. 2 hours ago, Bandit90 said:

    Month 2 Update

    Not a huge amount to share, I’m very much in the ugly-duckling phase. It is generally just growth from the first two hair transplants growing in. Positive signs for me this month, are that the donor area has seemingly recovered well, which I factored in to take longer. I did a DIY shave on the sides a couple of weeks back which certainly helped take the edge off, as it was beginning to look very untidy.  Also, the redness is fading, albeit at a glacial speed.

    I'll be honest, it’s all felt frustrating, mainly because I got so used to having hair and now, I’m waiting for it to grow in and for that all-important illusion of density to kick. It's all part and parcel of the ugly duckling phase but certainly can be mentally draining. In hindsight, I probably should have put a bit more consideration into doing unshaven FUE, that saying hopefully, in a couple of months, it will be all behind me.

    1.jpg

    2.jpg

    3.jpg

    4.jpg

    5.jpg

    6.jpg

    7.jpg

    8.jpg

    9.jpg

    10.jpg

    looks great for 2months short hairstyle suits you

  2. 42 minutes ago, Melvin- Admin said:

    That’s super interesting. Do you think you could post photos? That would be an interesting case study on oral minoxidil. I have been a big proponent of OM.

    Don't think he would give me permission

    He has a consult with pittella soon

    Quoted 4500k grafts

    Zarev quoted me 2300k grafts in March 23

    • Like 1
  3. i do think pittella's results show the benefit of oral minox. Not that he isnt an incredible surgeon.

    most of his patients are on that its worked better for me than finasteride which i was on for 2 years but had to stop.

     

    i have a twin brother & my hair is much better than is. Before i took OM & topical minox he had a stronger crown than me now im quite a bit ahead

  4. 51 minutes ago, BackFromTheBrink said:

    I'm curious about that. 

    Say I want 4000 hairs to be transplanted. Would Zarev potentially use more grafts (because he'd use partial grafts for a more homogenised donor) than a more traditional surgeon?

    So, it may take Zarev 3000 grafts opposed to 2000 grafts for another Dr?

    Would the cost per hair therefore be higher with Zarev (all other things being equal)?

    yeah he will take up to 80% if necessary & you donor will still look decent but need to be kept short

     

    i saw a case of 18k scalp grafts

  5. 1 hour ago, mr_peanutbutter said:

    will monitor this closely

     

    its hard to read though that according to zarev even very reputable surgeons basically destroy the donor with the common extraction technique @BlueSkyDay

    Yeah I would had quite a lot if grafts left

    Other surgeons just cause too much damage

    Really they need to fine tune the extraction 

    Hopefully in a few years we see more widespread improvements 

  6. 23 minutes ago, BlueSkyDay said:

    THE MARKET HAS SPOKEN
     

    Hello!

    Due to overwhelming demand for consultations and our fully booked schedule until 2027, we now offer only off-schedule consultations.

    The off-schedule consultations are at the price of 900 euro. In case you want to book an off-schedule consultation, the price of the surgery will be 9 euro per graft. We will put you with highest priority on our cancellations list. In case there is an opening we will contact you accordingly. The consultation will be performed in person (we do not offer online consultation). You will be requested to pay the consultation fee only if we manage to find you  an appropriate time slot for you. If you are an eligible candidate your surgery will be performed around two years after the consultation.
     All communication during the consultation and surgery will be in English.
    Please let us know if you would like to book an off-schedule appointment.

    Best regards,
    ZAREV | Clinic

    makes sense he would have too many patients now at 5euro per graft

    where did u see that?

    I do think he will have a surgeon trained in at some time hopefully

  7. 26 minutes ago, BlueSkyDay said:

    I want to thank the poster of this topic.

    It caused me to do further research on FUE techniques.

    I read Dr Zarev's web-page covering the 3 FUE techniques :

    (1) The Latest AVA FUE (2) Previous : Motorised FUE (not vacuum assisted) (3) Original Manual FUE.

    Dr Zarev makes it clear that there is only 1 winner : Vacuum assisted FUE. He believes the other 2 technqiues are not in the Patients best Interests because the damage to the donor area and grafts is unacceptably high. He states 20% to 30% of grafts are damaged. Unnecessary tissue is extracted causing additional / avoidable scarring, more trauma, longer recovery.

    It is absolutely outrageous that the IAHRS allows its members to continue using the old FUE techniques.

    As a result of this thread and the research it led me to do, I have cancelled my surgery for 2 April.

    The Gold Standard today is Vacuum Assisted FUE (AVA / Neograft / Trevillini) performed by an IAHRS surgeon, with all the memberships, qualifications and results to back up.

    These Vacuum assisted FUE devices have (1) improved graft quality, (2) reduced transections, and (3) make it easier to remove the grafts without trauma

    If the surgeon does not post after surgery photos of the donor area then be suspicious. I noticed this problem with the surgeon I was dealing with.

    Be very careful out there - Its an absolute minefield out there!

    Great Post

    Other surgeons need to step up there game in regards to the extraction of grafts

    No doubt about it

     

×
×
  • Create New...