Jump to content

TrixGlendevon

Senior Member
  • Posts

    770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TrixGlendevon

  1. Not really. I didn't even know he posted here. I just wanted to see successful examples of FUE with a lot of grafts transplanted
  2. Wow! I didn't expect this. I would appreciate some of the examples of the bad results of Feriduni etc. because these people are on my short list.
  3. Fewer risks overall with numbess etc. there can even be permanent pain. Also, tonight I saw a guy who had done a hair transplant (clearly with a terrible surgeon) and he had a massive scar across the back of his head. I felt sorry for him.
  4. I think your result is amazing! It looks great.
  5. Thanks again! No - this is actually a topic in most top medical schools' ethics classes and is a well-written about theme too. Amen to the second part!
  6. Thanks again for the response. I agree there may be some doctors who allow technicians to do all the work but all of the doctors on my short list show consistently good results and at least 2 do the whole procedure themselves. One of of whom only does 500-700 grafts a day too. 4 use the manual tool too. Given all this, would you still be against FUE over FUT? A top surgeon, with a good reputation and consistently good results? I am yet to look into what you have suggested but I will do before I go for my in-person consultations.
  7. It wasn't my question but they are interesting/helpful points he has raised. Any surgery, necessary or cosmetic, requires that the doctor gives the patient all the information they need to make an informed decision. This is ethical. The thing is, patients aren't doctors so unless we have a medical degree we can't make informed decisions. Even though I didn't want to ignite this debate, it is still helpful to have more information for both me and other forum members (I assume/hope). I plan on visiting several doctors in Europe over the next couple of months. I shall be asking them about this too now.
  8. @Dr. Alan Feller - Thanks for the reply. I didn't know you posted on here too. Shame you're not based in Europe. What you say makes sense and I will look into it/investigate, especially for my shortlist of doctors. I would ask what your response would be to @HTsoon who says it is a difference with progressiveness between European doctors and their American counterparts? I am not sure I believe that to be the case because you said in your videos that you have about 12 (+/-) years of experience with FUE. However, his hair looks amazing with 5,300 grafts all done by FUE as does the next poster, @Mick50, with 4,200 grafts also done by FUE.
  9. Hi! I have been watching Youtube videos produced by Doctors Feller and Bloxham this evening. I found them very informative and I also appreciate Dr Bloxham's comments on this site. However, I was quite taken back when I heard how against FUE they are. I was all set for FUE and now I am starting to have, at least some, reservations. I do not want to start an FUT vs FUE debate but I would like to know if anybody has had a successful (series of) hair transplant(s) with just FUE i.e. several thousand grafts (5,000+, maybe) or how common this type of patient/case is? Thanks
  10. Hi! I already emailed pictures earlier in the week with some questions and I am awaiting the reply.
  11. I don't think you do at all. I honestly think (no pun intended) it is all in your head.
  12. Yeah just looking at some of his other hairlines - they're really good! I have sent him an email and some pics and requested a consultation. Let's hope he is interested in me if he cherry picks. Thanks again.
  13. Thanks for the reply. I may get in touch with Lupanzula to visit them too. I will debate Keser as I love the fact that they do everything themselves (this is also why I will be visiting de Reys). I may look at flights to Turkey for a consultation....
  14. Thanks for your reply. I wouldn't go to Turkey as it is unregulated, irrespective of how good a reputation the surgeon has. I should have stipulated that I also don't want to wait for 3 years either which rules out the first 2 (I have been in touch with them). I am glad Feriduni has a reputation for hairlines as he is one of the ones I am visiting in Belgium. Not heard of Lupanzula. Where is s/he from?
  15. Hello everybody. Who would you say are the top few surgeons in Europe for hairlines? I am going to Belgium in a few weeks to speak to a 2 surgeons there but I may visit some others upon recommendation.
  16. Yeah - have you got any pics now the procedure has been a year?
  17. Hmmm not sure. It doesn't cause hair growth in men though, it just reduces hair loss which is different. Maybe it is the interaction of testosterone (higher in men) with the progesterone and the ratios between the two?
  18. You're only just half way over the mid-way point in the 12 months. Let's see how things progress over the next few months. It still looks good though.
  19. I thought I would post this article I read on a website that I read articles about weightlifting on. It is a list of anti-hairloss treatments and their pros and cons. I was wondering if anybody has used any of the less common ones such as the progresterone cream or the L-carnitine and what the results were? https://www.t-nation.com/living/how-not-to-go-bald
  20. I said 2-3 years for comic effect. I just meant it could be a lot worse (or not). I think it is more or less stable now but I will visit the doctors I am interested in going with in the next couple of months and see what they say in person!
  21. Just Minoxidil. I don't want to take fen. I agree but my frontal 3rd can't really get worse. The crown can (and will) but it hasn't changed in the last 6 months or so.
  22. Yes. I see his point, as I mentioned above, but I have no heard of anybody else being turned down because of their age. I would have thought at 32 I would be fine. I'd be almost 32.5-33 when when I had it too. I will have to hash it out with him in person when I see him in the summer.
  23. Hello! I have been in contact via email with Dr Feriduni (or his rep anyway). I am 31, almost 32, and I have been recommended to wait 2-3 years before getting my frontal 1/3 done and then waiting a further 2-3 years to get my crown done. The problem is, I think I will be completely bald by then. I understand the logic. They want to see how stable to my hairloss is. The crown is already quite bad though and the front has a tuft but benefits from the top of the head having hair which is also thick and so gives the illusion of having more hair at the front than I actually have. What does everybody else think about this advice? I am going to go on a visit in the summer to Belgium to visit a couple of doctors but I want to get people's advice anyway.
  24. Thanks guys! It seems like, as always, the better the surgeon the better the result will be
×
×
  • Create New...