I am 44 and live in Australia. I had few FUTs between 2001 and 2002 with a total grafts of 2700. These did not work so well. I have a big scar at the back and I am now considered to be a Norwood IV-V on the hair loss scale.
I have seek advices from several surgeons in Melbourne, Sydney and Dr. Path in Thailand. As many, I was undecided as to which technique to go for: FUT or FUE. All agreed that I will need about 2500 grafts to cover up the area but each of them trying to favour their technique in which they are more comfortable in.
Since I have not seen lots of amazing FUE results when it comes to large amount of grafts, I have opted in the first instance, to go for an FUT with Dr. Path. I have booked the surgery for June 2016. Based on the reviews and thanks to this forum it seems that Dr. Path is the best in the region and I was happy with our e-communication.
I am comfortable with my decision but just a bit wary as Dr. Path mentioned that he is reluctant to reduce previous scar as this will not yield the required grafts to fill in the area. The option with the best result is to have a new cut. So, I will be left with 2 scars
I have not discussed this further with him and will do so when I will meet him next month.
One of my objective when deciding to go back to FUT is to reduce my previous scar
Has anyone experience this kind of scenario?