Britanium

So very true, forums such as this are really antiquated, it's still being used as it has probably the biggest repository of results that can be found anywhere. The list should be only viewed as a guide to "some" good or elite Dr's, it is not a all encompassing list either, some very good choices are not included. I think it has more than a fair few Dr's who shouldn't be recommended in 2024, but that's just my opinion. Double edged sword though as other ways of advertising Dr's can be pure marketing, and therfore can't be trusted either. What works? Trawling through every medium you can find and making you're own mind up!. I have learned that a Dr can live of past glory, and/or not move on with the times, like a lot of Dr's still only focused on FUT (In the US particularly) Here in the UK we now have some relatively new names being mentioned, doesn't mean they won't prove to be a very good Dr within time, some may already be.

I am a "anonymous" senior member, who's been here about 12 years, seen 1000s of procedures and that was just my own opinion/thoughts. Definitely don't take mine or anyone's speculation on just how many grafts this might be though. Get another Dr's opnion, preferably in person of that's at all possible. I stand by my guesstimate that's its less, I also agree that the Dr's reply was inadequate since you asked specific questions and they were not answered. Personally I think you're concerns are valid, but I'm just a self professed armchair expert in the penaut gallery it seems.

Nice as this is showing the shape of things to come 😊enjoy you're time away 👍

You last posted 3 years ago with a lot of info regarding this clinic, are you connected to them in some way?

This is particularly impressive for such a early stage!

I'm a nurse so used to seeing Dr's scribbling but was struggling 🤣😁

Yeah I saw that too, it's very clear this was far from a straightforward ht, lots of things to consider here. Dr Bloxham hasn't posted here in years, let's see a public response to each of the very valid points the OP has raised.

3 strips taken on one procedure 😳 no that's far from usual. The 11 hours would usually indicate more than 1700 grafts for a FUT, but considering there was multiple strips taken and extra time needed then it's very difficult to ascertain how much time was taken for each step of the procedure. I agree that it's possible to get a very good idea of the grafts implanted via GIMP, but it's not going to be 100% accurate. Another Dr would perhaps also be able to say how many grafts might have been implanted. I'm unsure, but will say I definitely don't think it's 2700 from what I can see.

You're hair should still improve (thickening) right up to 12 months, sometimes even beyond. 2k was a fair amount of grafts, you will still have a lot left in the bank if you do want to go ahead with a 2nd ht. Transplants are very rarely one and done. Have you been updating and communicating with Dr Nader regarding you're progress.? Be interesting to see you're most recent pics. 👍

Some nice early progress 👍

Good luck in you're upcoming journey 😉

My guess would be NHT or Dezire. But let's see.

Honest opinion? Very poor work, in every sense. Awful design, terrible row like implanting, poor density, donor extraction pattern doesn't look good either. I could go on, I'm not trying to be unkind, just giving you some real reasons why you shouldn't be heading to the same clinic.

Yeh I miss his wittacism here 🙃

Hi, yes I'm very aware of all the factors that take are taken in consideration. Here I was just curious as to what it might be given it looks to be really good density, the figure of 90 cm2 is very good, I like seeing higher density when/where it's appropriate to do. Thank you for the reply 🙏