Newbie here....Hello!
My brief history....48 y.o., Norwood 2A/3 (w/some slight crown loss). Been wearing a hair system for about 4 years but got sick of the maintenance, cost, and fear of onlookers, not to mention the discomfort.
Anyways, I've researched a bit (should've done more in hindsight) and decided to get the FUE transplant from a reputable local hair doctor. I've read and was told that FUE is more conservative, less painful (yeah, right), and more importantly, no visible linear scar. After initial consultation, I was told that I needed 2500 grafts.
So, several days ago, I finally took the plunge and went for it. After 12 grueling, painful hours, I got my 2500 grafts. I also had the new PRP (platelet rich plasma) injection done to enhance growth. What surprised me most about the procedure was how painful it was, despite given plenty of local anesthetic....I felt everything, esp. the extraction of the donor grafts. I think I would rather go through 5 root canals in a row than go through that again!
So now I'm in day 3 and starting this long process of waiting for the new hairs to grow in. My biggest concern is density. I'm wondering now if 2500 grafts is enough to give me the look I want similar to when I had my hairpiece on. Now, I know a transplant can't match the density of a hairpiece but it's gotta be close, right? :confused: Anyways, I've read about some doctors who use special FUT methods to extract maximum amount of follicles at one time....something like 6000-8000 grafts and claim to use a special suture method to make linear scars practically invisible. Now I'm thinking I spent 12 painful hours to harvest 2500 grafts (along with having a big rectangle bald patch in the back of my head with thousands of small red holes) when I should've considered FUT with 5000 grafts? I don't know. I'm just afraid that after a year, I might need to get a second transplant because the improvement with the FUE wasn't good enough.