Aston33

Wow just seen this on another site, HIS Hair have gone bankrupt AGAIN!!!! that's the 3rd time in 3 years, Looks like they still owe 500k from the 2nd time they went bust for clients trying to sue them and now 10 ex employees are trying to sue them for not getting paid, what the hell are they doing, how can they screw things up that badly 3 times? Can't explain this one away with their excuse of restructuring, heard they lost all their good practitioners years ago but come on

Looks like Damien is also a director of Brandwood clinic, how can you be unbiased if you own part of a clinic? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10329672/officers

The owner of HIS has just had a transplant, but won't show his results, talk about not standing by your product haha

Or if you had the permanent version for a thickening effect you could just have a touch up in a few years when you lose more hair, your comment seemed to imply that you would need to take meds if you have the permanent version, which is actually the exact opposite, if you had temporary you would more likely need to take meds because it would fade a lot quicker and expose the current and new bald areas, then you would need the whole area redone as well as new bald areas instead of just having a touch up on the new bald areas if you had the permanent

Like I was discussing in another thread I wouldn't even of considered temporary smp before, I don't know why the fact a hair loss solution fades quicker than a more permanent version that is available is a good thing, let alone we now find out it now breaks down into the brain and could give you cancer, no thanks!!!

No definitely not mistaken, here is one example, completely gone after one year and the guys complaining because it has faded, which is exactly would would happen if you had tricopigmentation. Before you do it, please read. 1 year after with pics. - SMP Common Room - HIS Hair Clinic Even if it didn't disappear permanent would still be a better option, as you say the only advantage of tricopigmentation is that you could change the hairline when you want it to look more receded, which could easily be done with laser to remove the small part of the hairline, you wouldn't want the rest of the top to fade anyway other wise you would be forever going back to have it touched up and paying more money.

Sorry I'm not an smp company just someone interested in it so i wouldn't have a database of clients pics that have faded away treatments, why would every permanent smp company in the world say you will need a touch-up every couple of years? it's because it fades! just slower than tricopigmentation. I would go for permanent 100% don't fancy having to have it redone every year, the whole point of having something done is so you can forget about hair loss.

Sorry not true the permeant version is not a tattoo, it softens over time and will eventually disappear thats why you need touch-ups over the years, you say it disappears as if its a positive, why would you want your hair loss solution to disappear, they both fade over time, tricopigmentation just fades a lot quicker

Thanks for the reply Ahead ink, That would make sense of giving the client the option of letting the ink disappear organically if the permanent version was actually permeant but its not, you still need touch-ups every 3-5 years with the permeant version, so really the people that get permeant instead still have the same option but the touch-ups would just be less often than with tricopigmentation, thats why i don't get why people would choose if given the choose of having touch-ups every year as opposed to every 3 years. "It also eliminates the stress of worrying what might happen to the pigments over time" This would seem to imply that if you go with the permeant version you have to worry that the ink will change colour over time, but it is pretty well established that this is not the case and it will not change colour unless you went to some dodgy tattoo parlour that uses normal tattoo ink, to me clinics that offer tricopigmentation use this sentence to potentially scare clients away from having the permeant version where in reality they would not have any problems if they went to a decent clinic that offers the permeant version. The other examples you posted above to show the horseshoe on other clients all seem to have issues, either more density needed/brown looking or more blended needed, I don't mean to come across as too critical but I see better results from quite a few clinics that offer the permeant version. Saying that it's a personal choice and some clients will prefer tricopigmentation over permanent, i just don't see the advantages.

I know quite a lot of you favour tricopigmentation on here (semi permanent) but i really don't get it, I get people are nervous about getting smp done but why would you choose to have something that you have to have redone roughly every year when there is a more permanent version available, which would still need touchups over the years, to be honest almost every tricopigmentation result posted on here it looks like they have been done with brown ink, a shaved head would not be brown, it would be either black or a lighter version which would look grey. Like this image you can clearly see the treated area looks brown and his real hair is grey looking. It also needs lot more density to get rid of the horseshoe, Just my 2 cents

Hi MadManSlice, Sorry mate I didn't mean to offend you, it's a good treatment it's just i don't see HIS doing many soft hairlines 95% of them are sharp and straight but it's up to people to do there research and find a company that specialises in soft hairlines, i'm glad you're happy with your treatment and the 4th session should finish it off. I've seen that post on their forum about making company changes, but that's obviously what they are going to say, no one wants to admit they have gone bankrupt. Sorry but i'll believe the official government site over what they say i'm afraid and it's pretty clear they went bankrupt, you shouldn't believe what you see on the internet. Here's the link https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06951964/insolvency. Aston

Hi MadManSlice, How long ago was your last session and how many did you have? it still looks a bit red or you might need some more blending into your own hair. Nice even density but personally the hairline is too straight for my taste, but i suppose HIS don't do the soft look. Also how come you had it done at HIS they have just gone bankrupt, what are you going to do if you need a touch-up?

Your'e right SMPrince i've noticed they have been a lot more censoring too, I think i would probably just get blocked if i asked that question on their forum. Your other theory could of been true until you actually look on the scalpclinic.com and Skalphairclinic.com websites and can see they have actually bothered to design a new website for each one, if they just wanted to buy up web domains you can easily do that and just have a blank landing page, It's pretty obvious if you buy a domain and design a website with the exact same name as your competitor your a douchebag and doing it on purpose. To be honest I was put off HIS even before I saw their dirty tactics, A year ago they had practitioners with good reputations and names in the industry, since they went bankrupt I can't think of one good practitioner they have now, they have all left, they can't go off of a reputation they had 3-5 years ago.

While watching videos on youtube I stumbled across a company called scalpclinic.com, when looking into it I found out it's just HIS under another name, then discovered another site called Skalphairclinic.com which is also just another site for HIS. Why would one company need so many different websites offering the same treatment? I know a couple of practitioners that used to work at HIS now work for Skalp, which is not the same company as the skalphairclinic one, are HIS doing this doing this out of spite to try and confuse the public into thinking that there the same company? I don't get it, that's like Skalp opening another website and calling it Hishairs.com

Now that is what I call a good result, actually looks like a shaved head