Hi DR
I appreciate the response, yeah the best people to judge whether it is a good result or not are the coalition people such as Bill who have a wealth of experience.
Dont get me wrong, im not upset by the result so far and i appreciate the area to cover was vast as i was a type 5a ish and yes you did state that i would need 5000-6000 grafts to get a decent level (70% - 80%) coverage
However i do feel it couldve been better maybe im wrong?, thats why i asked if i had all my growth or was this all of it
I appreciate ur offer and would like to take it up if the general view is it couldve been better
I would like experienced members of this forum to offer there views on my result thus far so i can make a informed decision
What do you guys reckon to my result thus far, could the result have been better for 3000 grafts?
and how many grafts do you reckon is the result so far?
Thanks dr for your response