|
Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients |
|
||||||
|
Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name. You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today! If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ. |
| Future Medical treatments Discuss future possible treatments for hair loss like new drugs, gene therapy, hair follicle cloning, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
What subreddit was this in?
__________________
2110 FUT grafts by DR. Raymond Konior on July 30th, 2012 Best HT advice I have ever heard: "Find a doctor that you need more than they need you." Author Unknown Click Here to View Spanker's Website |
|
||||
|
This sounds good.......
"He said the finding raised the possibility of not only stopping hair loss, but of bald men also being able to regrow full heads of hair"
__________________
Dr. Dow Stough - 1200 Grafts - 1996 Dr. Jerry Wong - 4352 Grafts - August 2012 |
|
||||
|
Apparently, reducing prostaglandins and the enzymes responsible for producing prostaglandins on the scalp will be important in the future of hair restoration. However, I personally believe it will be another "dog in the fight," akin to minoxidil and finasteride; but I'm not sure hailing it as a "hair loss cure" is fair.
However, I look forward to seeing further research and actual product development.
__________________
Blake (Future_HT_Doc) Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum All opinions are my own and my advice should not constitute as medical advice. |
|
||||
|
Agreed future ht doc.
This was found on the /r/science/ subreddit. I think a hair loss cure will be comprised of many steps and levels until we reach the scientific knowledge to actually combat it in a single drug. Right now we use finasteride, minoxidil and hair transplants to achieve a satisfactory approach, but most of that is reactive not proactive. We need further advancement, like this here, to take us into the proactive fight and really give us follically challenged individuals a fair chance! |
|
||||
|
Why did you remove the link? I thought The Telegraph was fairly reputable. Although, I'm not sure of that, and I noticed what one poster pointed out was true: nothing in the article itself mentions the two years that the title claims.
|
|
||||
|
Outside links are a violation of our terms of service and not hosted on the forums. It has nothing to do with the credibility of the article itself.
__________________
Blake (Future_HT_Doc) Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum All opinions are my own and my advice should not constitute as medical advice. |
|
||||
|
heres a thought.....
if a cure does come out that makes all dormant hair follicles regrow hair, does that mean the areas that have been trnsplanted will become twice as thick? Would it affect transplanted hairs if the old follicles start to grow?? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|