Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients
Go Back   Forum By and for Hair Loss Patients > Surgical Hair Restoration > Hair Transplant Experiences and Surgeon Reviews

Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name.

You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today!

If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ.

Hair Transplant Experiences and Surgeon Reviews Share your own hair transplant experiences with others here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Top  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:00 AM
akuma's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Last Online: 05-22-2012 07:46 AM
Default Transplanted temples and eyebrow grew in faster than front hairline?

Hi guys, I got a minor transplant on March 2011. I transplanted my front hair line, temples, and eyebrows. My front hairline is quite thick, but my temples and eyebrows were very sparse.

After 5 months, my temples and eyebrows started to grow in quite fast. All the grafts sprouted quite quickly. I saw the density rise quickly. By the 8th month, the eyebrows and temples were thickened up fully. I could tell by looking at the roots. The frontal hair line was still sleeping though. No growth there

After another couple of months or something (estimate), the frontal hair line started to grow in. But the grow in was more sparse. It took more months for all the grafts to start growing. Now (at 10 months) most of the frontal grafts have grown in, but there is STILL some 1-2 millimeter baby hairs that have recently grown. The growth and thickening is there so i am happy.

But I am curious why the frontal hair took longer to "start" growing, and took longer for "each" graft to "start" growing. For the temple and eyebrow hair, most grafts started growing in a short time frame.

Is it normal for the frontal lock to start growing in later than temples and eyebrows?

What could be the reason? Is it because there is more blood supply near temples and eyebrows? Or is it that the frontal lock hair is "sharing" blood with the native thick hair?

Has anyone else experienced this?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2   Top  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:28 AM
akuma's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Last Online: 05-22-2012 07:46 AM
Default

Hair Graft Numbers in Follicular Hair Transplant Surgery | Bernstein Medical - Center for Hair Restoration

------------------------
Limits to Large Hair Transplant Sessions

Although the goal should be to accomplish the hair restoration as quickly as possible, there is a limit to the number of grafts that can be transplanted in one session. As the number of hair grafts placed per unit area (density) rises, so does the risk of vascular compromise (decreased blood flow to the area caused by injury to the scalp) and this may result in sub-optimal graft growth.
Other problems, such as graft elevation (popping), that may cause the grafts to dry out and an increased risk of mechanical trauma during graft placing, become more likely as hair graft density is taken to extremes and these factors may also cause the sub-optimal growth of grafts.
The blood supply to the scalp is very rich and can generally support a large number of transplanted grafts in a single session. However, sun damage and smoking are some of the factors that can significantly compromise this blood flow and these risk factors must be identified in advance by the hair transplant surgeon.
Problems associated with decreased blood flow and popping are more closely related to the number of hair grafts placed in a specific area (density) rather than the absolute numbers of grafts placed. For this reason, the transplantation of a large number of follicular unit grafts over a large area does not create the same problems as creating very high densities in one specific area.


----------------------


This states that high density can cause issues.



could it be due to higher density at the frontal hairline?
Reply With Quote
  #3   Top  
Old 01-21-2012, 01:08 PM
Atticus's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: California
Posts: 97
Last Online: 05-22-2012 09:04 AM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
Hi guys, I got a minor transplant on March 2011. I transplanted my front hair line, temples, and eyebrows. My front hairline is quite thick, but my temples and eyebrows were very sparse.

After 5 months, my temples and eyebrows started to grow in quite fast. All the grafts sprouted quite quickly. I saw the density rise quickly. By the 8th month, the eyebrows and temples were thickened up fully. I could tell by looking at the roots. The frontal hair line was still sleeping though. No growth there

After another couple of months or something (estimate), the frontal hair line started to grow in. But the grow in was more sparse. It took more months for all the grafts to start growing. Now (at 10 months) most of the frontal grafts have grown in, but there is STILL some 1-2 millimeter baby hairs that have recently grown. The growth and thickening is there so i am happy.

But I am curious why the frontal hair took longer to "start" growing, and took longer for "each" graft to "start" growing. For the temple and eyebrow hair, most grafts started growing in a short time frame.

Is it normal for the frontal lock to start growing in later than temples and eyebrows?

What could be the reason? Is it because there is more blood supply near temples and eyebrows? Or is it that the frontal lock hair is "sharing" blood with the native thick hair?

Has anyone else experienced this?

Thanks
Akuma, can you post some pix of your eyebrows? I am thinking of having my eyebrows beefed up a little.

Thanks,

Atticus
__________________
600 FUE - 12/07 - Performed by Dr. Umar of Redondo Beach, CA
Reply With Quote
  #4   Top  
Old 01-25-2012, 05:38 PM
akuma's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Last Online: 05-22-2012 07:46 AM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus View Post
Akuma, can you post some pix of your eyebrows? I am thinking of having my eyebrows beefed up a little.

Thanks,

Atticus
I'll try and take a pic once its fully grown in.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Top  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:49 PM
Atticus's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: California
Posts: 97
Last Online: 05-22-2012 09:04 AM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
I'll try and take a pic once its fully grown in.
Thanks!!!

Atticus
__________________
600 FUE - 12/07 - Performed by Dr. Umar of Redondo Beach, CA
Reply With Quote
  #6   Top  
Old 02-02-2012, 07:13 PM
akuma's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Last Online: 05-22-2012 07:46 AM
Default

anyone care to comment on my post if they experienced similar situation?
Reply With Quote
  #7   Top  
Old 02-04-2012, 09:07 AM
socbook1DB5's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 42
Last Online: 05-22-2012 01:33 PM
Default

In my HT my many transplanted hairs in my temporal areas didn't even fall out and go dormant. So the final results on my temples where in long before the hairline. The hairline itself to get to it's final result was about 13months, temple areas 5 months. Must be the more isolated area has more blood flow than the larger scalp area? Just a guess on my part.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Top  
Old 02-22-2012, 03:31 AM
akuma's Avatar
Member
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Last Online: 05-22-2012 07:46 AM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socbook1DB5 View Post
In my HT my many transplanted hairs in my temporal areas didn't even fall out and go dormant. So the final results on my temples where in long before the hairline. The hairline itself to get to it's final result was about 13months, temple areas 5 months. Must be the more isolated area has more blood flow than the larger scalp area? Just a guess on my part.
I think its due to dense packing. Im sure the surgeons dont densely pack the temples so they can achieve a softer look there.

But on the frontal scalp, if they do dense packing, there is a risk of lower blood supply.

There is a risk involved for poor growth at higher densities. I recall reading something about the risk of blood supply not being sufficient to support overly dense-packed areas.

I think my density on the frontal scalp is around 50 FU / cm2. Has anyone else experienced slow growth and thickening in densely packed areas?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0