Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients
Go Back   Forum By and for Hair Loss Patients > Non Surgical Treatments for Baldness > Future Medical treatments

Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name.

You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today!

If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ.

Future Medical treatments Discuss future possible treatments for hair loss like new drugs, gene therapy, hair follicle cloning, etc.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Top  
Old 09-07-2012, 02:52 PM
feelzgood's Avatar
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 52
Last Online: 09-15-2016 02:47 AM

I think he finds multihaired grafts and goes for a single hair in it, thus effectivly splits the graft on the spot while punching with that tinny drill. That's all there is to it.

He has been "pushing" this "type" of HT for a while and I can't help but ask how come none of his patients are coming on these forums and post their results? Huh?
Reply With Quote
  #82   Top  
Old 10-27-2012, 08:53 PM
sm535q's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Last Online: 11-19-2012 08:03 PM

Again, this is unfair. Frankly, we moderate a very fair, open set of discussion boards and simply because I'm (and others) not convinced by the very subjective and limited "evidence" you've provided thus far does not mean I have some ulterior agenda.

If these boards were really all about only supporting a certain type of procedure, why would we even allow this type of conversation? Why would I invite you to provide as much evidence and examples as possible? Why would I have personally researched and reported on hair duplication multiple times? Why would we recommend both the physician responsible for introducing the ACell/Matristem duplication technique (Dr. Cooley) and one of the only physicians in North American conducting hair duplication clinical trials (Dr. Rassman)?

I think this issue is important, and I'd really like to continue discussing it in a respectful, mature manner. Because of that, I am asking you, respectfully, to please refrain from these types of remarks.

There seems to be a conflict of interest here, if the site does get funding from doctors, we need to know from who and how much.We the readers should also know what the contractors entails, These concepts are taught in Ethics 101, after going through the website, i was not able to find a single section or link that mentions that doctors do fund this website.Very unethical
Reply With Quote
  #83   Top  
Old 10-27-2012, 11:10 PM
David - Moderator's Avatar
Forum Co-Moderator
Follicular Master
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 6,502
Last Online: 12-11-2017 10:02 AM

Originally Posted by sm535q View Post
i was not able to find a single section or link that mentions that doctors do fund this website.Very unethical
There has never been any attempt to disguise the fact that recommended surgeon must contribute a sponsorship fee to support the costs of running this community. Bill has addressed numerous time the high cost of operating a community of sites like this.

I'm not sure where you were looking but I've posted two easily located links below that state very clearly how the community is funded.

Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone would expect us to jump on the bandwagon of any unproven hair loss treatment whether it be surgical or medical. Most of us are hair loss sufferers and hair transplant recipients who are just as eager for more effective solutions to emerge that may help us to truly restore our lost locks to the fullest but wishing doesn't make it so.

Almost every day someone posts about a new revolutionary surgical procedure, medicine, dietary supplement, device, yoga position or magical chant sure to regrow your hair. We would be totally remiss in our role as patient advocates if we did not advise balding men and women to approach these "treatments" with caution. Instead of blindly jumping on the bandwagon, we support scientific documentation of these claimed results and advise members to be cautious or risk financial and/or physical disaster.

You can bet that when something comes along that is proven beyond a doubt to provide better results than FUT, FUE, Rogaine and Propecia, this community will be among the first to present it.

Ultimately, any grown adult has the freedom to pursue any treatment they wish and reap the benefits or suffer the consequences as the case may be.

How we select the hair restoration physicians recommended on this site.

Bottom of the page...
Important Note - The hair restoration physicians recommended on this site are not a definitive list of all excellent hair transplant doctors. Nor do we warranty or guaranty the results of any of the physicians presented on this site. As always, we encourage you to do your due diligence in evaluating these and all hair loss physicians.
View our full list of hair transplant doctors.
View tips on finding and evaluating hair transplant physicians.
Find a quality hair transplant doctor in your area.
How this online community is funded.

Those surgeons who are carefully reviewed and chosen for recommendation on this site contribute a monthly fee to co-sponsor this online community and display their before and after photos, videos and contact information.
Also stated in the sticky thread, How we recommend Hair Transplant Physicians

Those physicians who are chosen for recommendation based on their merits contribute a monthly sponsorship fee to pay for the cost of running this community.
David - Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant

I am not a medical professional. All opinions are my own and my advice should not constitute as medical advice.

View my Hair Loss Website
Reply With Quote
  #84   Top  
Old 03-02-2016, 05:07 PM
Dutchie's Avatar
Senior Member
Honorary Real Hair Club Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 816
Last Online: 04-27-2017 05:41 PM

Originally Posted by FinHairLoss View Post
I will be getting the procedure as soon as I can
You havent posted much since 2011, can you please give us an update on how your HST with this clinic went??
Reply With Quote
  #85   Top  
Old 08-17-2016, 12:12 AM
No Longer Active
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 40
Last Online: 09-18-2016 11:21 PM

I thought there was research into multiplying the number of hair follicles without the need to harvest them from the donor area. Can someone confirm this?
Reply With Quote
  #86   Top  
Old 09-08-2016, 04:43 PM
garethbale's Avatar
Senior Member
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 120
Last Online: 05-11-2018 08:01 PM

Gho is NOT legit. Do not fall for this nonsense.

He is splitting hairs, not multiplying them, and there is no stem cell transplantation involved.

He was asked to provide proof to a member on another forum and refused or was unable to provide it.
Reply With Quote
  #87   Top  
Old 09-15-2016, 02:43 AM
feelzgood's Avatar
Veteran Real Hair Club Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 52
Last Online: 09-15-2016 02:47 AM

After all these years the question still remains:

Is this legit or not legit?

Any well documented cases from this doc?

I see that uk chap never updated us on his progress not even on the other website. He stopped at 4 months mark. Not a good sign ��
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.