|
Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients |
|
||||||
|
Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name. You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today! If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ. |
| Hair Restoration Results Posted by Patients Feel free to post your hair transplant photos here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Pat,
I hate to bring this up, but Beehner's yield study of "skinny" vs. "chubby" grafts. The chubby grafts actually had a yield higher than 100%, presumably because hairs that were in the resting phase were being transplanted in tact. I have to believe that the same will hold true for transplanting DFU's as opposed to skinny grafts of only 1 or 2. It seems that the less fine dissection that occurs, the greater the overall yield. The main advantage of the skinny grafts is that while the yield is lower, they can be planted closer together. However I believe that if a clinic wants the highest possible yield it would probably be from using all DFUs. This of course is not feasible because of the need for a natural hairline. So I'm really not sure what the differnce in density is going to be between a doc using all DFUs and one using skinny grafts trimed down to the smallest bundles possible. Thats why I suggest the only way to know is to look at results. If Mohamnd is getting dense, aesthetically pleasing results with his technique, the more power to him. Its a shame he doesnt meet the crieria for the coalition. I suppose the standards are to eliminate the majority who would not be getting good results sans microscope.
__________________
My Hair Loss Web Site - Hair Transplant with Dr. Wong |
|
||||
|
TheEmperor,
Quote:
Whether "chubby", "skinny" or double follicular units are created/trimmed, using a more powerful tool will make it easier for the technicians and possibly lessen the transection rate. Whereas cases can be made for smaller sessions, the use of double follicular units, and chubby grafts, I can't seem to find a logical argument as to why an inferior tool (2.5 loops) should be used in place of microscopes, when it has been proven to produce higher yield. By the way, Dr. Mohmand was recommended, not a member of the Coalition. Click here to learn about the differences and the standards for each. Bill
__________________
Managing Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog and the Hair Loss Forum and Social Community View our hair loss articles on EZineArticles.com Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletters | How We Recommend Physicians ----- To learn about how I restored my hair, view my my hair loss website. Remember, true beauty radiates from within, not from the skin. I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own. |
|
||||
|
Dear Pat
I will buy the microscope, not because I am convinced, but because to see if you are right or wrong. What I will do is make two teams, each on rt and left side of midline. One will do my conventional method, the other will do the microscope. I will divide the strip measured and divide in half and see the yield of grafts n hairs both. Will do the surgery and then see the difference between both sides on same patient. Let me really see the difference, in fact I will propose this and my research project......there you go This forum has given me an oppertunity to think and learn and find....so this is good. But....I am still not convinced. In the meanwhile when I am suspended I will send you with my results and will label them as 'Results of Loop magnification dissection only'. Please do feel free to criticize as much as you can, that makes me keep on going. Pat and Bill, hope to see you in Montreal. Thank you all
__________________
--- I am a medical advisor to Lexington International and Hairmax. What ever I say is my personal opinion. Dr. Mohmand is recommended on the Hair Transplant Network |
|
||||
|
I agree SadHair--- I applaud his reaction to criticism and willingness to stand in here.
However, I am unwilling to ever embrace the notion that microscopes do not provide an advantage, ever. Dr. Bernstein is renowned for his research and theory and writting innumerous articles----the study he and Rassman did proves that a difference exists. All and all, I am glad that Dr. M is buying a microscope, with hopefully more to come. Jason
__________________
Go Cubs! 6721 transplanted grafts 13,906 hairs Performed by Dr. Ron Shapiro Dr. Ron Shapiro and Dr. Paul Shapiro are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. |
|
||||
|
Dr. Mohmand,
Thank you for your willingness and desire to improve your technology, even if you are going for a trial run. I think you if you take a look at the strip under loops verses a microscope, you will see an obvious difference. Though it is quite possible that your technicians are getting excellent growth yield, at the very least, the microscope should make their work easier and more efficient. Of course, in the meantime, you encourage you to continue to post and hope that as you begin to adopt microscopes, we can recommend you once again as the leading hair transplant clinic in Pakistan. Best wishes, Bill
__________________
Managing Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog and the Hair Loss Forum and Social Community View our hair loss articles on EZineArticles.com Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletters | How We Recommend Physicians ----- To learn about how I restored my hair, view my my hair loss website. Remember, true beauty radiates from within, not from the skin. I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own. |
|
||||
|
nice one Dr M.
good to see a healthy discussion that ends well. i hope that the microscope will aid your technicians do there job more comfortably, cant be easy dissecting all those fine hairs grafts etc... hope to see great results as always from you. all the best FS
__________________
My Hair Loss Weblog - Hair Transplant with Dr. Bessam Farjo |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|